Cant find this in my astornomy book please help.Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Hm, I think its false....but don't take my word for it.Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Are you asking if the rate of Fusion, how quickly the star is ';burning'; its nuclear fuel, I do believe it is dependant on the mass of the star. A larger star will burn its fuel more quickly, however there will be more fuel for it to burn.
I think it's true.
Friday, February 12, 2010
The most important part in any symbolic system is a culture's mores.True or False?
True in personal relationships, false on a computer.
Important question about medical treatment in a socialized healthcare system. TRUE or FALSE?
Doctors will be able to provide the most efficient and beneficial treatment if insurance companies aren't dictating what the doctors can prescribe you. True or False?Important question about medical treatment in a socialized healthcare system. TRUE or FALSE?
TRUE
Private Insurance is profit driven, and makes more money by finding ways to deny claims. It's a conflict of interest. Of course with Obama's plan, you'd still have the choice to stay with the old.Important question about medical treatment in a socialized healthcare system. TRUE or FALSE?
My doctor is the one who makes my medical decisions not my insurance company. If we have socialized medical care the government will have the final say. There is also the times when the government fails to complete the budget on time and can not pay bills. Do you think doctors will work very hard if they can not get reimbursed? This is a problem that Medicare/ caid is currently having. Many doctors do not take Medi because they can not collect in a timely manner.
Lady Moon I have visited your country on a few occasions and I remember once while in Manchester there was a public outcry over a stripper who had breast augmentation at the taxpayers expense. The government allowed it because she claimed it was important if she wanted to increase her earnings. I will not argue against you if you like your system but I will state that I do not want my money taken from my family to pay for a strippers breast implants. My daughter's education is more important to me than a stripper's ability to earn tips.
I think we all need to be careful when we keep hearing this mantra: ';socialized';. Remember that large amounts of our own economy are ';socialized.'; For example, most schools, roads, police, firefighting, libraries, post offices, and other city/county/state services have always been socialized here (run by the government.) Even the military, state and national guards, social security, state disability, welfare programs, city and county sponsored sports, are socialized. Even government jobs, the largest employer there is, even bigger than Walmart believe it or not, are run by the government and hence can be called ';socialized.'; Even the internet was a government sponsored creation. Many highly successful businesses and technologies (IBM, AT%26amp;T for example) were/are protected and nurtured by the government and then handed over to the private sector.
Really, if you had the choice between a privately owned security police force like Black Water, and the regular city police to take care of your community to choose from, which would you pick?
I've had the same problem treated in the for profit private system and the socialized VA system. The VA care was far superior. I have painful heal spurs. I went to a local podiatrist for treatment. He took x-rays, made a plaster cast of my feet, and eventually gave me inserts to wear in my shoes. The pain lessened and became tolerable but he kept bringing me back in every week for a checkup at a cost of fifteen bucks copay out of my pocket and billed my insurance $125 each five minute visit. After a while I stopped going and stopped wearing the inserts. A few months back the pain became unbearable again so I went to the VA. One visit, no copay. They made a 3D computerized model of my feet and gave me some temporary inserts for my shoes. The temporary inserts relieved my pain more than the ';custom'; inserts from the private doctor. I got my custom inserts from the VA a few weeks later and I'm a new man, virtually pain free. From my experience I would have to validate your assumption. The doctor at the VA gets paid no matter how many times he sees me, his only incentive is to make me feel better. The private doctor only gets paid each time I come in, his only incentive is to keep me in treatment. It's more profitable for him to treat me rather than cure me.
Doctors already dictate what to prescribe us. If we turn it over to bureaucratic idiots who don't give a crap, then doctors won't be able to care for patients anymore. Get it? Or haven't you been to a doctor lately?
edit - I never said I think insurance companies care about us. Assume much? ';Hahaha!! Get a clue?'; Why don't you??
I'd have to agree - true.
Fact is in the United States we have both higher infant mortality (im) and lower life expectancy (l) than most European countries. See http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004393.h鈥?/a> for mortality and life; see http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/33/38979鈥?/a> for costs.
United States -- im= 6.4, L= 78.0, cost $7290, 16.0% of GDP
Canada --------- im= 4.6, L= 80.3, cost $3895, 10.1% of GDP
Austria -------- im= 4.5, L= 79.2, cost $3763, 10.1% of GDP
United Kingdom -- im= 5.0, L= 78.7, cost $3895, 8.4%
Denmark ----- im= 4.5, L= 78.0, cost $3362, 10.4%
Finland ------ im= 3.5, L= 78.7, cost $2840, 8.2%
France ------- im= 4.2, L= 79.9, cost $4763, 11.0%
Germany ----- im= 4.1, L= 79.0, cost $3527, 10.4%
Greece ------- im= 5.3, L= 79.4, cost $2727, 9.6%
Italy ---------- im= 5.7, L= 79.9, cost $2686, 8.7%
Norway ------ im= 3.6, L= 79.7, cost $4763, 8.9%
Spain -------- im= 4.3, L= 79.8, cost $2671, 8.5%
Sweden ------ im= 2.8, L= 80.6, cost $3323, 9.1%
Switzerland --- im= 4.3, L= 80.6, cost $4417, 10.8%
USA has 36 days longer life expectancy than these two countries!
Ireland ------ im= 5.2, L= 77.9, cost $3424, 7.6%
Portugal ---- im= 4.9, L= 77.9, cost $2150, 9.9%
Some folks blame our high costs on malpractice insurance. But the numbers don't support that. Including legal fees, insurance costs, and payouts, the cost of the suits comes to less than 1.5 percent of health-care spending. See http://www.insurance-reform.org/pr/AIRhe鈥?/a> and http://makethemaccountable.com/myth/Risi鈥?/a> Along those lines, it's interesting to note that a number of states already have ';caps and tort reform'; yet the insurance companies haven't lowered the cost of malpractice insurance in those states.
.
True. What I find hard to believe, is the way people are reacting to this. You'd think that Obama was trying to take people's guns away and demanding to install cameras in folks homes, rather than just trying to give everyone health care.
False. Tort reform is not part of Obamacare.
TRUE. And this comes from a Brit.
I have lived under the UK's NHS system all my life and have never been denied care or had to wrangle with some profit-orientated Insurance Co in order to get the treatment I needed.
The NHS frees doctors be able to provide the care their patients need. There is no Insurance Co between you and your doctor. No bureaucrat or Corporate Goon telling you what you can and can't receive. Your doctor is free to give you the care you need. Regardless of how much money you have or whether your policy will cover it.
You still have as much choice as you could wish for regarding which doctor you see or where you get your treatment. The Republicans are telling outright lies about all this!
Plus, we still have a private system alongside the NHS which has been forced to become cheaper and more competitive to compete with the NHS. Therefore, private healthcare is also more affordable and easier to get in the UK than in the USA. Many people use a mixture of NHS and private.
And for those who can't afford private, the NHS is always there and covers all of their needs.
Read this American's experience of the NHS. This woman talks sense:
http://potentialandexpectations.wordpres鈥?/a>
Daniel Hannan MEP is a lying little scumbag. Noone here in the UK pays attention to him so he's hopped over the Pond to play with the Republicans. He's a right wing nutjob and not even the Conservatives take him seriously. Even the Conservative Party Leader, David Cameron, has just publicly denounced him and what he is doing. Ignore this loser, like we do in the UK!blond hair
TRUE
Private Insurance is profit driven, and makes more money by finding ways to deny claims. It's a conflict of interest. Of course with Obama's plan, you'd still have the choice to stay with the old.Important question about medical treatment in a socialized healthcare system. TRUE or FALSE?
My doctor is the one who makes my medical decisions not my insurance company. If we have socialized medical care the government will have the final say. There is also the times when the government fails to complete the budget on time and can not pay bills. Do you think doctors will work very hard if they can not get reimbursed? This is a problem that Medicare/ caid is currently having. Many doctors do not take Medi because they can not collect in a timely manner.
Lady Moon I have visited your country on a few occasions and I remember once while in Manchester there was a public outcry over a stripper who had breast augmentation at the taxpayers expense. The government allowed it because she claimed it was important if she wanted to increase her earnings. I will not argue against you if you like your system but I will state that I do not want my money taken from my family to pay for a strippers breast implants. My daughter's education is more important to me than a stripper's ability to earn tips.
I think we all need to be careful when we keep hearing this mantra: ';socialized';. Remember that large amounts of our own economy are ';socialized.'; For example, most schools, roads, police, firefighting, libraries, post offices, and other city/county/state services have always been socialized here (run by the government.) Even the military, state and national guards, social security, state disability, welfare programs, city and county sponsored sports, are socialized. Even government jobs, the largest employer there is, even bigger than Walmart believe it or not, are run by the government and hence can be called ';socialized.'; Even the internet was a government sponsored creation. Many highly successful businesses and technologies (IBM, AT%26amp;T for example) were/are protected and nurtured by the government and then handed over to the private sector.
Really, if you had the choice between a privately owned security police force like Black Water, and the regular city police to take care of your community to choose from, which would you pick?
I've had the same problem treated in the for profit private system and the socialized VA system. The VA care was far superior. I have painful heal spurs. I went to a local podiatrist for treatment. He took x-rays, made a plaster cast of my feet, and eventually gave me inserts to wear in my shoes. The pain lessened and became tolerable but he kept bringing me back in every week for a checkup at a cost of fifteen bucks copay out of my pocket and billed my insurance $125 each five minute visit. After a while I stopped going and stopped wearing the inserts. A few months back the pain became unbearable again so I went to the VA. One visit, no copay. They made a 3D computerized model of my feet and gave me some temporary inserts for my shoes. The temporary inserts relieved my pain more than the ';custom'; inserts from the private doctor. I got my custom inserts from the VA a few weeks later and I'm a new man, virtually pain free. From my experience I would have to validate your assumption. The doctor at the VA gets paid no matter how many times he sees me, his only incentive is to make me feel better. The private doctor only gets paid each time I come in, his only incentive is to keep me in treatment. It's more profitable for him to treat me rather than cure me.
Doctors already dictate what to prescribe us. If we turn it over to bureaucratic idiots who don't give a crap, then doctors won't be able to care for patients anymore. Get it? Or haven't you been to a doctor lately?
edit - I never said I think insurance companies care about us. Assume much? ';Hahaha!! Get a clue?'; Why don't you??
I'd have to agree - true.
Fact is in the United States we have both higher infant mortality (im) and lower life expectancy (l) than most European countries. See http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004393.h鈥?/a> for mortality and life; see http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/33/38979鈥?/a> for costs.
United States -- im= 6.4, L= 78.0, cost $7290, 16.0% of GDP
Canada --------- im= 4.6, L= 80.3, cost $3895, 10.1% of GDP
Austria -------- im= 4.5, L= 79.2, cost $3763, 10.1% of GDP
United Kingdom -- im= 5.0, L= 78.7, cost $3895, 8.4%
Denmark ----- im= 4.5, L= 78.0, cost $3362, 10.4%
Finland ------ im= 3.5, L= 78.7, cost $2840, 8.2%
France ------- im= 4.2, L= 79.9, cost $4763, 11.0%
Germany ----- im= 4.1, L= 79.0, cost $3527, 10.4%
Greece ------- im= 5.3, L= 79.4, cost $2727, 9.6%
Italy ---------- im= 5.7, L= 79.9, cost $2686, 8.7%
Norway ------ im= 3.6, L= 79.7, cost $4763, 8.9%
Spain -------- im= 4.3, L= 79.8, cost $2671, 8.5%
Sweden ------ im= 2.8, L= 80.6, cost $3323, 9.1%
Switzerland --- im= 4.3, L= 80.6, cost $4417, 10.8%
USA has 36 days longer life expectancy than these two countries!
Ireland ------ im= 5.2, L= 77.9, cost $3424, 7.6%
Portugal ---- im= 4.9, L= 77.9, cost $2150, 9.9%
Some folks blame our high costs on malpractice insurance. But the numbers don't support that. Including legal fees, insurance costs, and payouts, the cost of the suits comes to less than 1.5 percent of health-care spending. See http://www.insurance-reform.org/pr/AIRhe鈥?/a> and http://makethemaccountable.com/myth/Risi鈥?/a> Along those lines, it's interesting to note that a number of states already have ';caps and tort reform'; yet the insurance companies haven't lowered the cost of malpractice insurance in those states.
.
True. What I find hard to believe, is the way people are reacting to this. You'd think that Obama was trying to take people's guns away and demanding to install cameras in folks homes, rather than just trying to give everyone health care.
False. Tort reform is not part of Obamacare.
TRUE. And this comes from a Brit.
I have lived under the UK's NHS system all my life and have never been denied care or had to wrangle with some profit-orientated Insurance Co in order to get the treatment I needed.
The NHS frees doctors be able to provide the care their patients need. There is no Insurance Co between you and your doctor. No bureaucrat or Corporate Goon telling you what you can and can't receive. Your doctor is free to give you the care you need. Regardless of how much money you have or whether your policy will cover it.
You still have as much choice as you could wish for regarding which doctor you see or where you get your treatment. The Republicans are telling outright lies about all this!
Plus, we still have a private system alongside the NHS which has been forced to become cheaper and more competitive to compete with the NHS. Therefore, private healthcare is also more affordable and easier to get in the UK than in the USA. Many people use a mixture of NHS and private.
And for those who can't afford private, the NHS is always there and covers all of their needs.
Read this American's experience of the NHS. This woman talks sense:
http://potentialandexpectations.wordpres鈥?/a>
Daniel Hannan MEP is a lying little scumbag. Noone here in the UK pays attention to him so he's hopped over the Pond to play with the Republicans. He's a right wing nutjob and not even the Conservatives take him seriously. Even the Conservative Party Leader, David Cameron, has just publicly denounced him and what he is doing. Ignore this loser, like we do in the UK!
The smallest particle of an element that exhibits its charactertics is an atom true or false?
true or falseThe smallest particle of an element that exhibits its charactertics is an atom true or false?
trueThe smallest particle of an element that exhibits its charactertics is an atom true or false?
The definition of an ';atom';:
atom
the smallest particle of a chemical element that still exhibits the characteristics of that element. An atom constitutes protons and neutrons in its nucleus and levels of orbiting electrons.
yes, although an atom can be broken down into neutrons protons and electrons, they loose their elemental charictaristics.
True
absolutely true, there is nothing smaller than atom in an element?
true
fals-o
true
true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My english is not to good...but if you split an element down to atom size, you can get trouble...It may not be stabile...
But i am not sure if this is your question...
TRUE
It's true.
I'm not sure they keep finding all these new particles...I would say true though.
A quark or photon or whatever will not display the characteristics of the element.
Depends on which characteristics you mean... For the chemical ones it is true, also true for such physical features such as absorption spectrums. For characteristics like melting/freezing and boiling point it is not true since these features require atomic groups (these are macroscopic characteristics, like there is no way for a single atom to evaporate is there), i think there needs to be at least a couple of hundred atoms to interpret macroscopic features.
All in all, for most things atoms are the smallest such particles, but there are some characteristics that need atomic aggregations.
that is true In chemistry and physics, an atom (Greek 峒勏勎课嘉肯?or 谩tomos meaning ';the smallest indivisible particle of matter, i.e. something that cannot be divided';) is the smallest particle still characterizing a chemical element.
true!
trueThe smallest particle of an element that exhibits its charactertics is an atom true or false?
The definition of an ';atom';:
atom
the smallest particle of a chemical element that still exhibits the characteristics of that element. An atom constitutes protons and neutrons in its nucleus and levels of orbiting electrons.
yes, although an atom can be broken down into neutrons protons and electrons, they loose their elemental charictaristics.
True
absolutely true, there is nothing smaller than atom in an element?
true
fals-o
true
true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My english is not to good...but if you split an element down to atom size, you can get trouble...It may not be stabile...
But i am not sure if this is your question...
TRUE
It's true.
I'm not sure they keep finding all these new particles...I would say true though.
A quark or photon or whatever will not display the characteristics of the element.
Depends on which characteristics you mean... For the chemical ones it is true, also true for such physical features such as absorption spectrums. For characteristics like melting/freezing and boiling point it is not true since these features require atomic groups (these are macroscopic characteristics, like there is no way for a single atom to evaporate is there), i think there needs to be at least a couple of hundred atoms to interpret macroscopic features.
All in all, for most things atoms are the smallest such particles, but there are some characteristics that need atomic aggregations.
that is true In chemistry and physics, an atom (Greek 峒勏勎课嘉肯?or 谩tomos meaning ';the smallest indivisible particle of matter, i.e. something that cannot be divided';) is the smallest particle still characterizing a chemical element.
true!
Do you think this is true or false?
Its better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all?Do you think this is true or false?
True to a point. Everything happens for a reason which changes the way of life and the way of thinking. It could be for the best or for the worse! You'll never know until it happens, both ways.Do you think this is true or false?
Very true.
There's not much that really compares to loving and being loved--if it is actually true--and you can't know what an incredible thing you are missing if you have never taken a chance.
No risk, no gain. Just as long as you don't try for something that is quite literally doomed to fail from the start.
yes, it is true because the feeling that you get when you love someone and know that they love you too is the best feeling in the world.
That is true.
And it also depends on the individual.
Very true..
TRUE
true
move on...philosophy bs will only make you crazy and its pointless in the end...love or dont, its YOUR choice
i think it is entirely true.
yes, it hepls you learn what love is and what you want in a relationship
of course who would want to spend the rest of their lives wondering, what if.
True to a point. Everything happens for a reason which changes the way of life and the way of thinking. It could be for the best or for the worse! You'll never know until it happens, both ways.Do you think this is true or false?
Very true.
There's not much that really compares to loving and being loved--if it is actually true--and you can't know what an incredible thing you are missing if you have never taken a chance.
No risk, no gain. Just as long as you don't try for something that is quite literally doomed to fail from the start.
yes, it is true because the feeling that you get when you love someone and know that they love you too is the best feeling in the world.
That is true.
And it also depends on the individual.
Very true..
TRUE
true
move on...philosophy bs will only make you crazy and its pointless in the end...love or dont, its YOUR choice
i think it is entirely true.
yes, it hepls you learn what love is and what you want in a relationship
of course who would want to spend the rest of their lives wondering, what if.
Sri lankan Government believes that Tamil tigers are weakened and are unable to defend the East true or false?
The GOSL believes that Tamil Tigers are weakened in the east and won't be able to defend it's territories. Also the GOSL believes that the Tamil Tigers won't be able to carryout any major offensives in the east. In the past, prior to the ceasefire agreement, the Tamil Tigers have showed their military strength by over throwing many Sri lankan Army bases within days and liberating territories from the GOSL. If the full scale war breaks out what will be the outcome?Sri lankan Government believes that Tamil tigers are weakened and are unable to defend the East true or false?
More people will be killed and international countries will intervene......again killing more people.........
The war has been going on for 25 years.......the government will not give in to terrorists demands until LTTE adopts a peaceful approach..........
You only refer to attacks carried out by LTTE against the government military.
Why don't you talk about all the mass murders executed by LTTE on innocent civilians.Sri lankan Government believes that Tamil tigers are weakened and are unable to defend the East true or false?
why dont you go look at all tha civilan murders tha Sri Lankan Soliders do. Know your history before you talk, dont talk if you dont know anything and just go with tha media
More people will be killed and international countries will intervene......again killing more people.........
The war has been going on for 25 years.......the government will not give in to terrorists demands until LTTE adopts a peaceful approach..........
You only refer to attacks carried out by LTTE against the government military.
Why don't you talk about all the mass murders executed by LTTE on innocent civilians.Sri lankan Government believes that Tamil tigers are weakened and are unable to defend the East true or false?
why dont you go look at all tha civilan murders tha Sri Lankan Soliders do. Know your history before you talk, dont talk if you dont know anything and just go with tha media
Report Abuse
I heard that Vince Mchman is bringing back The rock true or false ?
He may want to but it's not going to happen.
The Rock is an actor now.I heard that Vince Mchman is bringing back The rock true or false ?
To wrestle: absolutely false. I wouldn't be surprised if he's GM for Raw one day though.I heard that Vince Mchman is bringing back The rock true or false ?
FALSE
i doubt it
FALSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
False, The Rock took acting and movie deals, and I doubt he'll ever look back.
true he signed a conract for like wrestmania and 2 other ppvs!
False! You just want attention
The Rock is an actor now.I heard that Vince Mchman is bringing back The rock true or false ?
To wrestle: absolutely false. I wouldn't be surprised if he's GM for Raw one day though.I heard that Vince Mchman is bringing back The rock true or false ?
FALSE
i doubt it
FALSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
False, The Rock took acting and movie deals, and I doubt he'll ever look back.
true he signed a conract for like wrestmania and 2 other ppvs!
False! You just want attention
More fertile after a miscarriage, true or false?
ive heard that right after a miscarriage your are more fertile than if you had not had one...is this true?
last month i miscarried after just 4 weeks, and we wanted to keep trying...could it be easier to get pregnant now?More fertile after a miscarriage, true or false?
Yes, your chances are higher during the first 3 months following a miscarriage or D%26amp;C/D%26amp;E. The high hormone levels gear the body though they don't quite understand it completely.
I was told that a D%26amp;C or D%26amp;E increases fertility chances because they clear out everything in the uterus so you get a fresh smooth lining. Some women have growths in their uterus or fail to shed their lining completely both of which can prevent or delay pregnancy.
There's no reason to wait a month to try again unless you had a complication like overly heavy bleeding that required medical intervention or an infection, etc. My D%26amp;E's happened less than 10 months apart. One had to be done due to retaining the placenta after a miscarriage at 15 weeks (I almost died on the OR table because of the placenta) and the other after a chem pregnancy at 4.3 weeks). My doctor started helping me with fertility treatment starting my first cycle. As he stated to me, the body will not allow ovulation or pregnancy if the body is not ready for a pregnancy. I truly believe that. But you also have to be emotionally ready. Stress and depression can lower your chances of getting pregnant. So if you're stressing about getting pregnant again and/or depressed over the loss, it can hamper getting pregnant.More fertile after a miscarriage, true or false?
It's actually true!
You are always most fertile just after being pregnant. Whether that pregnancy ends at 5 weeks or at 40 you are still super fertile. This is why you hear of a lot of people getting pregnant again right after giving birth.. They always think they can't get pregnant that quick but it's quite the opposite.
Sorry to hear about your loss but good luck and baby dust to you this month.
research shows...false! no evidence to support this. i have had 2 after d and c I got pregnant 4 months later....after natural m/c i got pregnant next cycle. i used the fertility monitor. sorry for your loss....just wait one cycle and keep trying!
I heard it's true especially if you had a D%26amp;C done. But the doctors usually advice to wait one cycle before trying to conceive again.
True you usually are more fertile after a miscarriage.
Its true.but its better to wait one mnth r two
i saw true but i would wait a month to heel
last month i miscarried after just 4 weeks, and we wanted to keep trying...could it be easier to get pregnant now?More fertile after a miscarriage, true or false?
Yes, your chances are higher during the first 3 months following a miscarriage or D%26amp;C/D%26amp;E. The high hormone levels gear the body though they don't quite understand it completely.
I was told that a D%26amp;C or D%26amp;E increases fertility chances because they clear out everything in the uterus so you get a fresh smooth lining. Some women have growths in their uterus or fail to shed their lining completely both of which can prevent or delay pregnancy.
There's no reason to wait a month to try again unless you had a complication like overly heavy bleeding that required medical intervention or an infection, etc. My D%26amp;E's happened less than 10 months apart. One had to be done due to retaining the placenta after a miscarriage at 15 weeks (I almost died on the OR table because of the placenta) and the other after a chem pregnancy at 4.3 weeks). My doctor started helping me with fertility treatment starting my first cycle. As he stated to me, the body will not allow ovulation or pregnancy if the body is not ready for a pregnancy. I truly believe that. But you also have to be emotionally ready. Stress and depression can lower your chances of getting pregnant. So if you're stressing about getting pregnant again and/or depressed over the loss, it can hamper getting pregnant.More fertile after a miscarriage, true or false?
It's actually true!
You are always most fertile just after being pregnant. Whether that pregnancy ends at 5 weeks or at 40 you are still super fertile. This is why you hear of a lot of people getting pregnant again right after giving birth.. They always think they can't get pregnant that quick but it's quite the opposite.
Sorry to hear about your loss but good luck and baby dust to you this month.
research shows...false! no evidence to support this. i have had 2 after d and c I got pregnant 4 months later....after natural m/c i got pregnant next cycle. i used the fertility monitor. sorry for your loss....just wait one cycle and keep trying!
I heard it's true especially if you had a D%26amp;C done. But the doctors usually advice to wait one cycle before trying to conceive again.
True you usually are more fertile after a miscarriage.
Its true.but its better to wait one mnth r two
i saw true but i would wait a month to heel
Is this true or false It is not necessary to include facts or statistics in a persuasive essay. ?
It is not necessary to include facts or statistics in a persuasive essay.
True
False
Is this true or false It is not necessary to include facts or statistics in a persuasive essay. ?
false i think. it is necessary because the person/people you would be trying to persuade would need proof. duh...nix the duhIs this true or false It is not necessary to include facts or statistics in a persuasive essay. ?
If the facts and statistics are relevant to your argument(s) and are from a credible source, then they can be incredibly useful in making your essay more persuasive. Whether or not they're absolutely necessary can be debateable. It really depends on what the essay is for. Sometimes, you can have a persuasive essay without statistics if the subject matter isn't really conducive to statistics.
In general, though, I'd say it's true.
It really depends on what you're 'persuading' your readers about. Say, for instance, if it was about drop out rates of students, you might want to add a statistic or two in there but you shouldn't make your whole paper in statistics. Or, maybe abortion, a couple statistics here and there. Facts are always fine, but the numbers and percentages and such aren't always required.
Depends...if it is a free response and it is not common knowledge then true, if it is a research type essay then false.blond hair
True
False
Is this true or false It is not necessary to include facts or statistics in a persuasive essay. ?
false i think. it is necessary because the person/people you would be trying to persuade would need proof. duh...nix the duhIs this true or false It is not necessary to include facts or statistics in a persuasive essay. ?
If the facts and statistics are relevant to your argument(s) and are from a credible source, then they can be incredibly useful in making your essay more persuasive. Whether or not they're absolutely necessary can be debateable. It really depends on what the essay is for. Sometimes, you can have a persuasive essay without statistics if the subject matter isn't really conducive to statistics.
In general, though, I'd say it's true.
It really depends on what you're 'persuading' your readers about. Say, for instance, if it was about drop out rates of students, you might want to add a statistic or two in there but you shouldn't make your whole paper in statistics. Or, maybe abortion, a couple statistics here and there. Facts are always fine, but the numbers and percentages and such aren't always required.
Depends...if it is a free response and it is not common knowledge then true, if it is a research type essay then false.
Are the typical components of fertilizer carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous? (True or False)?
I think that its false because carbon is not in fertilizers but any help would be appreciated thanks.Are the typical components of fertilizer carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous? (True or False)?
False ! The key elements are potash ( potassium), phosphate and nitrogen
JT
False ! The key elements are potash ( potassium), phosphate and nitrogen
JT
TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
False. The Summer Institute for Linguistics (SIL) Ethnologue Survey (1999) lists the following as the top languages by population:
(number of native speakers in parentheses)
Chinese* (937,132,000)
Spanish (332,000,000)
English (322,000,000)
Bengali (189,000,000)
Hindi/Urdu (182,000,000)
Arabic* (174,950,000)
Portuguese (170,000,000)
Russian (170,000,000)
Japanese (125,000,000)
German (98,000,000)
French* (79,572,000)
* The totals given for Chinese, Arabic, and French include more than one SIL variety.TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
False.
Very false.
Mandarin is the most widely spoken language. (Chinese)TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
depends on if you're counting the most PEOPLE speaking it, or the most COUNTRIES having it as the main language
No, we are in 2nd place Chinese Mandarin is the most spoken.
FALSE
not true
(number of native speakers in parentheses)
Chinese* (937,132,000)
Spanish (332,000,000)
English (322,000,000)
Bengali (189,000,000)
Hindi/Urdu (182,000,000)
Arabic* (174,950,000)
Portuguese (170,000,000)
Russian (170,000,000)
Japanese (125,000,000)
German (98,000,000)
French* (79,572,000)
* The totals given for Chinese, Arabic, and French include more than one SIL variety.TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
False.
Very false.
Mandarin is the most widely spoken language. (Chinese)TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
depends on if you're counting the most PEOPLE speaking it, or the most COUNTRIES having it as the main language
No, we are in 2nd place Chinese Mandarin is the most spoken.
FALSE
not true
True or False: When balancing an equation, only change the coefficient number, not the subatomic number?
Right. Subatomic particles do not participate in chemical reactions. True or False: When balancing an equation, only change the coefficient number, not the subatomic number?
true
true
True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
I have heard it said that guys have a relationship so they might have sex while gals have sex so that they might have a relationship.;
I have observed that this is frequently the case.True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
Tough to answer, people are all so different. There are girls and boys who do what the same things, but it isn't always the right things.
What I want is kindness, respect, commitment, love and partnership. I am old enough to know that some guys don't want that. But it isn't hard to find those that do at all. Too many people generalize men and women into single categories and don't allow anything outside of the box.
I just got married, and he wants the same things I do. If he wouldn't have, I simply would have not dated him after I found out. But after 4 years, I was more than certain. So for me, my guy wants the same things I do.True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
Only on certain issues like honesty and feeling respected and niceness believe it or not!
Most girls think that guys put girl's looks highest on their list, but in actuality it is towards the bottom.
Character is what builds you up and others notice.
So have a strong character!
False. Both want something completely different from one another but use both as a way to get what they want. Men and women however....totally different game. At that point--we just state what we want and if that's not what you want to give (sex v. commitment) then we move on.
Nope. Everyone likes love. Unless you are a gay democrat like some people on here, then you deserve death.
If you've never had a girl friend, oh well, no stress in your life, more money for you, no arguments.
I do not plan on getting married at all, as I want to be a millionaire.
';Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.';
Boys love to have sex with girls and girls have sex with boys for love.
Not exactly. There is one common desire though. Okay maybe two because the other person has to be fun to hang out with.
Wouldn't you like to know, mr. ';30 and never had a girlfriend';.
Your whole premise is false. Boys only want boys. Girls are icky
True and false.
True
I do not want girl dong.
I have observed that this is frequently the case.True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
Tough to answer, people are all so different. There are girls and boys who do what the same things, but it isn't always the right things.
What I want is kindness, respect, commitment, love and partnership. I am old enough to know that some guys don't want that. But it isn't hard to find those that do at all. Too many people generalize men and women into single categories and don't allow anything outside of the box.
I just got married, and he wants the same things I do. If he wouldn't have, I simply would have not dated him after I found out. But after 4 years, I was more than certain. So for me, my guy wants the same things I do.True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
Only on certain issues like honesty and feeling respected and niceness believe it or not!
Most girls think that guys put girl's looks highest on their list, but in actuality it is towards the bottom.
Character is what builds you up and others notice.
So have a strong character!
False. Both want something completely different from one another but use both as a way to get what they want. Men and women however....totally different game. At that point--we just state what we want and if that's not what you want to give (sex v. commitment) then we move on.
Nope. Everyone likes love. Unless you are a gay democrat like some people on here, then you deserve death.
If you've never had a girl friend, oh well, no stress in your life, more money for you, no arguments.
I do not plan on getting married at all, as I want to be a millionaire.
';Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.';
Boys love to have sex with girls and girls have sex with boys for love.
Not exactly. There is one common desire though. Okay maybe two because the other person has to be fun to hang out with.
Wouldn't you like to know, mr. ';30 and never had a girlfriend';.
Your whole premise is false. Boys only want boys. Girls are icky
True and false.
True
I do not want girl dong.
True or False: When the engine is cold the computer function will be in ';open loop';?
Please explain.True or False: When the engine is cold the computer function will be in ';open loop';?
That's somewhat true for the fuel trims, ie the length of the fuel injector pulses. There is air control and timing control being done, of course, but until there is a stable (in spec) reading from the O2 sensors, the machine is running without that feedback (thus, open loop).
Newer cars have heated sensors (HEGO in your Haynes manual) that speed up when you hit the temperature at which the exhaust gas can start to interact with the material of the O2 sensor (heavy metal oxide, non-stoichiometric, so O2 in hot gas stream changes the balance of oxygen vacancies and a current is established to keep the material neutrally charged).
That's somewhat true for the fuel trims, ie the length of the fuel injector pulses. There is air control and timing control being done, of course, but until there is a stable (in spec) reading from the O2 sensors, the machine is running without that feedback (thus, open loop).
Newer cars have heated sensors (HEGO in your Haynes manual) that speed up when you hit the temperature at which the exhaust gas can start to interact with the material of the O2 sensor (heavy metal oxide, non-stoichiometric, so O2 in hot gas stream changes the balance of oxygen vacancies and a current is established to keep the material neutrally charged).
True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
If you properly define ';intelligence'; it is the ability to learn and then properly apply what you have learned. That has nothing to do with ';education';. Plenty of highly intelligent people in the world had or have no formal education but accomplish extraordinary things. On the other hand plenty of people with advanced formal education cannot figure out that they are being hoodwinked.
Therefore the answer is ';true'; Education does not always equal intelligence. The two are mutually exclusive.
The reason so many ';educated'; people seem totally clueless is due to radical changes in higher and lower education since the 1960's. Students are more and more being taught what to think instead of how to think. That is not education but indoctrination.
Learning that Barack Obama is the fist Black President, is a Democrat, lives in the White House etc is learning about the President. ';Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm. mmm'; is indoctrination.
*True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
Hahahahahaha..I agree that education does not always equal intelligence, but when it comes to someone RUNNING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, I expect them to at least have the ability to form a well thought out sentence, which is something George Bush could never do.
If anyone's trying to discredit Obama's education due to affirmative action - YOU clearly have no education. Please save yourself the embarassment from posting things on message boards without further researching them, thanks.True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
True.
Assuming you retain the information it doesn't equate to the ability to put it into practice nor the wisdom to adapt and apply it appropriately.
True.
Unfortunately, though, some people take that to mean that lack of education equals intelligence.
You're not automatically ';smarter'; than educated people because you dropped out of school, contrary to what most dropouts would like to believe.
True.
Having said that, why do cons worship Ignorance?
Rash Limpboy: Flunked out of community college.
Sean Hannity : Ditto
Butterball Beck: Too point-blank stupid to even be accepted into any community college.
false..
confused though.. you have this under POLITICS
so under that.. YES education does matter.. running the office should at least require some legitimate schooling..
just saying Glenn Beck stopped at GED and it clearly shows.. when concerning politics at least provide sufficient evidence..
Notice how only the liberal answers have to add the Conservatives that they hate? The question ask a straight forward a true or false!
LIberals can't even answer a T or F without there name dropping.
TRUE is my answer
True
A degree from one university is not necessarily as good as a degree from another.
Obvious, I know lots of highly degreed people making less than people with no college. Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Donald Trump either have no degrees or no advanced degrees.
Let me quote the words of Albert Eienstein : '; The only thing that interferes with my learning is my Education! ';
True.
But lack of education almost always equals ignorance.
Very true. Look at George W Bush- he graduated from Yale, but he has the smarts of a baked potato.
Look at Obama! They obviously do not teach history at Harvard!
VERY true. I see over educated dumb asses all the time here in NY.
True...Every child is different.
Absolutely true
True. A child with a 180 IQ is not educated
True
True....very TRUE
yes for example GWBblond hair
Therefore the answer is ';true'; Education does not always equal intelligence. The two are mutually exclusive.
The reason so many ';educated'; people seem totally clueless is due to radical changes in higher and lower education since the 1960's. Students are more and more being taught what to think instead of how to think. That is not education but indoctrination.
Learning that Barack Obama is the fist Black President, is a Democrat, lives in the White House etc is learning about the President. ';Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm. mmm'; is indoctrination.
*True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
Hahahahahaha..I agree that education does not always equal intelligence, but when it comes to someone RUNNING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, I expect them to at least have the ability to form a well thought out sentence, which is something George Bush could never do.
If anyone's trying to discredit Obama's education due to affirmative action - YOU clearly have no education. Please save yourself the embarassment from posting things on message boards without further researching them, thanks.True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
True.
Assuming you retain the information it doesn't equate to the ability to put it into practice nor the wisdom to adapt and apply it appropriately.
True.
Unfortunately, though, some people take that to mean that lack of education equals intelligence.
You're not automatically ';smarter'; than educated people because you dropped out of school, contrary to what most dropouts would like to believe.
True.
Having said that, why do cons worship Ignorance?
Rash Limpboy: Flunked out of community college.
Sean Hannity : Ditto
Butterball Beck: Too point-blank stupid to even be accepted into any community college.
false..
confused though.. you have this under POLITICS
so under that.. YES education does matter.. running the office should at least require some legitimate schooling..
just saying Glenn Beck stopped at GED and it clearly shows.. when concerning politics at least provide sufficient evidence..
Notice how only the liberal answers have to add the Conservatives that they hate? The question ask a straight forward a true or false!
LIberals can't even answer a T or F without there name dropping.
TRUE is my answer
True
A degree from one university is not necessarily as good as a degree from another.
Obvious, I know lots of highly degreed people making less than people with no college. Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Donald Trump either have no degrees or no advanced degrees.
Let me quote the words of Albert Eienstein : '; The only thing that interferes with my learning is my Education! ';
True.
But lack of education almost always equals ignorance.
Very true. Look at George W Bush- he graduated from Yale, but he has the smarts of a baked potato.
Look at Obama! They obviously do not teach history at Harvard!
VERY true. I see over educated dumb asses all the time here in NY.
True...Every child is different.
Absolutely true
True. A child with a 180 IQ is not educated
True
True....very TRUE
yes for example GWB
True or false one key disadvantage of the contractor system of apparel production is lack of quality control?
The question seems a little vague or simply needs more context added.
However, if you are questioning the potential issues that come with an organization purchasing from suppliers, then the answer is usually FALSE!
Anytime any organization deals with suppliers or the production of some item or service (think of software programming - there are always bugs due to lack of communications), then there is a large potential for the item/service being provided to not meet the requirements. This is due to any number of reasons, the least of which is usually ';quality'; based in and of itself.
The largest impact is the communication process between the organization and its suppliers. Now you could call this a lack of quality communication, however, most people fail to see it that way.
Any supplier can demonstrate some level of quality control for what they produce. The real question is how well those quality control processes or procedures actually meet the customer requirements which is usually a breakdown in communicating what is needed by the customer (at least in production companies).
One of the sources below mentions the Ford SQI experiment. One of the outcomes of that effort was the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) supplier manual entitled: Advance Product Quality Planning (APQP). This book is all about how companies and suppliers need to work together prior to production to ensure good quality products are delivered during normal production cycles.
So if a professor in school is asking your question, I would say False due to my real life activities in industry and any number of articles that you can find at ASQ, Quality Digest, Quality Magazine and other sources of information. With that said, I am sure that you can always find a few examples of failure due to lack of quality control, however, even in those situations, I would still content that the root cause was lack of communication versus pure lack of quality.
You may also want to look into the Quality Management System (QMS) stuff at ISO. It always seems to come back to communication between the organization and its suppliers.True or false one key disadvantage of the contractor system of apparel production is lack of quality control?
True. It's always better to build quality into the design and manufacture rather than merely ';inspecting it in'; at the end stage. It's often necessary to station your own inspector at the contractor's site in order to remedy problems ASAP.
However, if you are questioning the potential issues that come with an organization purchasing from suppliers, then the answer is usually FALSE!
Anytime any organization deals with suppliers or the production of some item or service (think of software programming - there are always bugs due to lack of communications), then there is a large potential for the item/service being provided to not meet the requirements. This is due to any number of reasons, the least of which is usually ';quality'; based in and of itself.
The largest impact is the communication process between the organization and its suppliers. Now you could call this a lack of quality communication, however, most people fail to see it that way.
Any supplier can demonstrate some level of quality control for what they produce. The real question is how well those quality control processes or procedures actually meet the customer requirements which is usually a breakdown in communicating what is needed by the customer (at least in production companies).
One of the sources below mentions the Ford SQI experiment. One of the outcomes of that effort was the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) supplier manual entitled: Advance Product Quality Planning (APQP). This book is all about how companies and suppliers need to work together prior to production to ensure good quality products are delivered during normal production cycles.
So if a professor in school is asking your question, I would say False due to my real life activities in industry and any number of articles that you can find at ASQ, Quality Digest, Quality Magazine and other sources of information. With that said, I am sure that you can always find a few examples of failure due to lack of quality control, however, even in those situations, I would still content that the root cause was lack of communication versus pure lack of quality.
You may also want to look into the Quality Management System (QMS) stuff at ISO. It always seems to come back to communication between the organization and its suppliers.True or false one key disadvantage of the contractor system of apparel production is lack of quality control?
True. It's always better to build quality into the design and manufacture rather than merely ';inspecting it in'; at the end stage. It's often necessary to station your own inspector at the contractor's site in order to remedy problems ASAP.
True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
Of course it's true! Vietnam vets taught us that.True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
100% trueTrue or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
True.
True.
true
100% trueTrue or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
True.
True.
true
True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
My friend said you can get pregnant from having sex with your DAD but I heard that when his sperms enters your body it dies because it knows its in the same blood as he is. So I can't get pregnant from doing stuff with my Dad or I can?
This isn't perverted by the way, don't take it the wrong way/True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
there was a story on the news a year or 2 ago about some father and daughter who fell in love and had 3 kids together.
i think the kids had birth defects and they had a few miscarriages/stillborns too.
but yeh its just as possible to get pregnant from a relative than with anyone else. they just have a very high chance of dying or having defects.
its just wrong..True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
OK, first of all this question does worry me somewhat....
However, your friend is correct. You can get pregnant by your dad or ANY man for that matter. Most likely if you were to have children with your own father, your children would have some sort of disabilities.
You CAN get pregnant from your dad. It's definitely TRUE. That's one reason why there are birth defects... it's called IMBREEDING %26amp; it's illegal. But, yeah, your dad can make you pregnant. So can your brother, uncle, cousin. The sperm don't detect blood types.
If you're planning on doing stuff with your dad, I say this is definitely perverted.
Either way its a dumb fuuking question because we always hear about incest cases when a father rapes his daughter and she becomes pregnant.
Your friend is a moron.
You absolutely can get impregnated by your own father. The baby would have a lot of birth defects, but you'd still have a baby.
Yes you can and unfortunatly there has been many cases.
Yeah you can. Some sick people do.
whoa! incest....anyhoo, yes you can still become pregnant by your dad...he has sperm just like every other male on this planet.
Um...of course you can get pregnant if your dad has sex with you. There are many documented cases of this happening.
If that were true then Southern Senators would be a lot more fanatical about abortion laws...
You CAN get pregnant from you Dad. It's called incest.
Yes, you can. And how can we not take it the wrong way? That's a sick question.
Yes you can still get pregnant. But this is still Fu%26amp;ked up!
Yes you can.... but its sick to even think about things like that tbh
yes you can..he has sperm so its possible
yea you can one of my friend did!...is so damn sick! but its happened
you still can get pregnant. and eww why would u ask such a question anyways?
please go to the police and tell them if that is what is going on it is incest... very illegal
This isn't perverted by the way, don't take it the wrong way/True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
there was a story on the news a year or 2 ago about some father and daughter who fell in love and had 3 kids together.
i think the kids had birth defects and they had a few miscarriages/stillborns too.
but yeh its just as possible to get pregnant from a relative than with anyone else. they just have a very high chance of dying or having defects.
its just wrong..True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
OK, first of all this question does worry me somewhat....
However, your friend is correct. You can get pregnant by your dad or ANY man for that matter. Most likely if you were to have children with your own father, your children would have some sort of disabilities.
You CAN get pregnant from your dad. It's definitely TRUE. That's one reason why there are birth defects... it's called IMBREEDING %26amp; it's illegal. But, yeah, your dad can make you pregnant. So can your brother, uncle, cousin. The sperm don't detect blood types.
If you're planning on doing stuff with your dad, I say this is definitely perverted.
Either way its a dumb fuuking question because we always hear about incest cases when a father rapes his daughter and she becomes pregnant.
Your friend is a moron.
You absolutely can get impregnated by your own father. The baby would have a lot of birth defects, but you'd still have a baby.
Yes you can and unfortunatly there has been many cases.
Yeah you can. Some sick people do.
whoa! incest....anyhoo, yes you can still become pregnant by your dad...he has sperm just like every other male on this planet.
Um...of course you can get pregnant if your dad has sex with you. There are many documented cases of this happening.
If that were true then Southern Senators would be a lot more fanatical about abortion laws...
You CAN get pregnant from you Dad. It's called incest.
Yes, you can. And how can we not take it the wrong way? That's a sick question.
Yes you can still get pregnant. But this is still Fu%26amp;ked up!
Yes you can.... but its sick to even think about things like that tbh
yes you can..he has sperm so its possible
yea you can one of my friend did!...is so damn sick! but its happened
you still can get pregnant. and eww why would u ask such a question anyways?
please go to the police and tell them if that is what is going on it is incest... very illegal
True or False: When the engine is cold the computer function will be in ';open loop';?
Please explain.True or False: When the engine is cold the computer function will be in ';open loop';?
That's somewhat true for the fuel trims, ie the length of the fuel injector pulses. There is air control and timing control being done, of course, but until there is a stable (in spec) reading from the O2 sensors, the machine is running without that feedback (thus, open loop).
Newer cars have heated sensors (HEGO in your Haynes manual) that speed up when you hit the temperature at which the exhaust gas can start to interact with the material of the O2 sensor (heavy metal oxide, non-stoichiometric, so O2 in hot gas stream changes the balance of oxygen vacancies and a current is established to keep the material neutrally charged).
That's somewhat true for the fuel trims, ie the length of the fuel injector pulses. There is air control and timing control being done, of course, but until there is a stable (in spec) reading from the O2 sensors, the machine is running without that feedback (thus, open loop).
Newer cars have heated sensors (HEGO in your Haynes manual) that speed up when you hit the temperature at which the exhaust gas can start to interact with the material of the O2 sensor (heavy metal oxide, non-stoichiometric, so O2 in hot gas stream changes the balance of oxygen vacancies and a current is established to keep the material neutrally charged).
True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
Of course it's true! Vietnam vets taught us that.True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
100% trueTrue or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
True.
True.
true
100% trueTrue or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
True.
True.
true
True or False: When balancing an equation, only change the coefficient number, not the subatomic number?
trueTrue or False: When balancing an equation, only change the coefficient number, not the subatomic number?
Right. Subatomic particles do not participate in chemical reactions.blond hair
Right. Subatomic particles do not participate in chemical reactions.
True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
If you properly define ';intelligence'; it is the ability to learn and then properly apply what you have learned. That has nothing to do with ';education';. Plenty of highly intelligent people in the world had or have no formal education but accomplish extraordinary things. On the other hand plenty of people with advanced formal education cannot figure out that they are being hoodwinked.
Therefore the answer is ';true'; Education does not always equal intelligence. The two are mutually exclusive.
The reason so many ';educated'; people seem totally clueless is due to radical changes in higher and lower education since the 1960's. Students are more and more being taught what to think instead of how to think. That is not education but indoctrination.
Learning that Barack Obama is the fist Black President, is a Democrat, lives in the White House etc is learning about the President. ';Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm. mmm'; is indoctrination.
*True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
Hahahahahaha..I agree that education does not always equal intelligence, but when it comes to someone RUNNING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, I expect them to at least have the ability to form a well thought out sentence, which is something George Bush could never do.
If anyone's trying to discredit Obama's education due to affirmative action - YOU clearly have no education. Please save yourself the embarassment from posting things on message boards without further researching them, thanks.True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
True.
Assuming you retain the information it doesn't equate to the ability to put it into practice nor the wisdom to adapt and apply it appropriately.
True.
Unfortunately, though, some people take that to mean that lack of education equals intelligence.
You're not automatically ';smarter'; than educated people because you dropped out of school, contrary to what most dropouts would like to believe.
True.
Having said that, why do cons worship Ignorance?
Rash Limpboy: Flunked out of community college.
Sean Hannity : Ditto
Butterball Beck: Too point-blank stupid to even be accepted into any community college.
false..
confused though.. you have this under POLITICS
so under that.. YES education does matter.. running the office should at least require some legitimate schooling..
just saying Glenn Beck stopped at GED and it clearly shows.. when concerning politics at least provide sufficient evidence..
Notice how only the liberal answers have to add the Conservatives that they hate? The question ask a straight forward a true or false!
LIberals can't even answer a T or F without there name dropping.
TRUE is my answer
True
A degree from one university is not necessarily as good as a degree from another.
Obvious, I know lots of highly degreed people making less than people with no college. Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Donald Trump either have no degrees or no advanced degrees.
Let me quote the words of Albert Eienstein : '; The only thing that interferes with my learning is my Education! ';
True.
But lack of education almost always equals ignorance.
Very true. Look at George W Bush- he graduated from Yale, but he has the smarts of a baked potato.
Look at Obama! They obviously do not teach history at Harvard!
VERY true. I see over educated dumb asses all the time here in NY.
True...Every child is different.
Absolutely true
True. A child with a 180 IQ is not educated
True
True....very TRUE
yes for example GWB
Therefore the answer is ';true'; Education does not always equal intelligence. The two are mutually exclusive.
The reason so many ';educated'; people seem totally clueless is due to radical changes in higher and lower education since the 1960's. Students are more and more being taught what to think instead of how to think. That is not education but indoctrination.
Learning that Barack Obama is the fist Black President, is a Democrat, lives in the White House etc is learning about the President. ';Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm. mmm'; is indoctrination.
*True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
Hahahahahaha..I agree that education does not always equal intelligence, but when it comes to someone RUNNING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, I expect them to at least have the ability to form a well thought out sentence, which is something George Bush could never do.
If anyone's trying to discredit Obama's education due to affirmative action - YOU clearly have no education. Please save yourself the embarassment from posting things on message boards without further researching them, thanks.True or False, Education does not always equal intelligence?
True.
Assuming you retain the information it doesn't equate to the ability to put it into practice nor the wisdom to adapt and apply it appropriately.
True.
Unfortunately, though, some people take that to mean that lack of education equals intelligence.
You're not automatically ';smarter'; than educated people because you dropped out of school, contrary to what most dropouts would like to believe.
True.
Having said that, why do cons worship Ignorance?
Rash Limpboy: Flunked out of community college.
Sean Hannity : Ditto
Butterball Beck: Too point-blank stupid to even be accepted into any community college.
false..
confused though.. you have this under POLITICS
so under that.. YES education does matter.. running the office should at least require some legitimate schooling..
just saying Glenn Beck stopped at GED and it clearly shows.. when concerning politics at least provide sufficient evidence..
Notice how only the liberal answers have to add the Conservatives that they hate? The question ask a straight forward a true or false!
LIberals can't even answer a T or F without there name dropping.
TRUE is my answer
True
A degree from one university is not necessarily as good as a degree from another.
Obvious, I know lots of highly degreed people making less than people with no college. Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Donald Trump either have no degrees or no advanced degrees.
Let me quote the words of Albert Eienstein : '; The only thing that interferes with my learning is my Education! ';
True.
But lack of education almost always equals ignorance.
Very true. Look at George W Bush- he graduated from Yale, but he has the smarts of a baked potato.
Look at Obama! They obviously do not teach history at Harvard!
VERY true. I see over educated dumb asses all the time here in NY.
True...Every child is different.
Absolutely true
True. A child with a 180 IQ is not educated
True
True....very TRUE
yes for example GWB
True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
I have heard it said that guys have a relationship so they might have sex while gals have sex so that they might have a relationship.;
I have observed that this is frequently the case.True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
Tough to answer, people are all so different. There are girls and boys who do what the same things, but it isn't always the right things.
What I want is kindness, respect, commitment, love and partnership. I am old enough to know that some guys don't want that. But it isn't hard to find those that do at all. Too many people generalize men and women into single categories and don't allow anything outside of the box.
I just got married, and he wants the same things I do. If he wouldn't have, I simply would have not dated him after I found out. But after 4 years, I was more than certain. So for me, my guy wants the same things I do.True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
Only on certain issues like honesty and feeling respected and niceness believe it or not!
Most girls think that guys put girl's looks highest on their list, but in actuality it is towards the bottom.
Character is what builds you up and others notice.
So have a strong character!
False. Both want something completely different from one another but use both as a way to get what they want. Men and women however....totally different game. At that point--we just state what we want and if that's not what you want to give (sex v. commitment) then we move on.
Nope. Everyone likes love. Unless you are a gay democrat like some people on here, then you deserve death.
If you've never had a girl friend, oh well, no stress in your life, more money for you, no arguments.
I do not plan on getting married at all, as I want to be a millionaire.
';Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.';
Boys love to have sex with girls and girls have sex with boys for love.
Not exactly. There is one common desire though. Okay maybe two because the other person has to be fun to hang out with.
Wouldn't you like to know, mr. ';30 and never had a girlfriend';.
Your whole premise is false. Boys only want boys. Girls are icky
True and false.
True
I do not want girl dong.
I have observed that this is frequently the case.True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
Tough to answer, people are all so different. There are girls and boys who do what the same things, but it isn't always the right things.
What I want is kindness, respect, commitment, love and partnership. I am old enough to know that some guys don't want that. But it isn't hard to find those that do at all. Too many people generalize men and women into single categories and don't allow anything outside of the box.
I just got married, and he wants the same things I do. If he wouldn't have, I simply would have not dated him after I found out. But after 4 years, I was more than certain. So for me, my guy wants the same things I do.True or false boys want from girls what girls want from boys?
Only on certain issues like honesty and feeling respected and niceness believe it or not!
Most girls think that guys put girl's looks highest on their list, but in actuality it is towards the bottom.
Character is what builds you up and others notice.
So have a strong character!
False. Both want something completely different from one another but use both as a way to get what they want. Men and women however....totally different game. At that point--we just state what we want and if that's not what you want to give (sex v. commitment) then we move on.
Nope. Everyone likes love. Unless you are a gay democrat like some people on here, then you deserve death.
If you've never had a girl friend, oh well, no stress in your life, more money for you, no arguments.
I do not plan on getting married at all, as I want to be a millionaire.
';Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.';
Boys love to have sex with girls and girls have sex with boys for love.
Not exactly. There is one common desire though. Okay maybe two because the other person has to be fun to hang out with.
Wouldn't you like to know, mr. ';30 and never had a girlfriend';.
Your whole premise is false. Boys only want boys. Girls are icky
True and false.
True
I do not want girl dong.
True or false one key disadvantage of the contractor system of apparel production is lack of quality control?
The question seems a little vague or simply needs more context added.
However, if you are questioning the potential issues that come with an organization purchasing from suppliers, then the answer is usually FALSE!
Anytime any organization deals with suppliers or the production of some item or service (think of software programming - there are always bugs due to lack of communications), then there is a large potential for the item/service being provided to not meet the requirements. This is due to any number of reasons, the least of which is usually ';quality'; based in and of itself.
The largest impact is the communication process between the organization and its suppliers. Now you could call this a lack of quality communication, however, most people fail to see it that way.
Any supplier can demonstrate some level of quality control for what they produce. The real question is how well those quality control processes or procedures actually meet the customer requirements which is usually a breakdown in communicating what is needed by the customer (at least in production companies).
One of the sources below mentions the Ford SQI experiment. One of the outcomes of that effort was the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) supplier manual entitled: Advance Product Quality Planning (APQP). This book is all about how companies and suppliers need to work together prior to production to ensure good quality products are delivered during normal production cycles.
So if a professor in school is asking your question, I would say False due to my real life activities in industry and any number of articles that you can find at ASQ, Quality Digest, Quality Magazine and other sources of information. With that said, I am sure that you can always find a few examples of failure due to lack of quality control, however, even in those situations, I would still content that the root cause was lack of communication versus pure lack of quality.
You may also want to look into the Quality Management System (QMS) stuff at ISO. It always seems to come back to communication between the organization and its suppliers.True or false one key disadvantage of the contractor system of apparel production is lack of quality control?
True. It's always better to build quality into the design and manufacture rather than merely ';inspecting it in'; at the end stage. It's often necessary to station your own inspector at the contractor's site in order to remedy problems ASAP.
However, if you are questioning the potential issues that come with an organization purchasing from suppliers, then the answer is usually FALSE!
Anytime any organization deals with suppliers or the production of some item or service (think of software programming - there are always bugs due to lack of communications), then there is a large potential for the item/service being provided to not meet the requirements. This is due to any number of reasons, the least of which is usually ';quality'; based in and of itself.
The largest impact is the communication process between the organization and its suppliers. Now you could call this a lack of quality communication, however, most people fail to see it that way.
Any supplier can demonstrate some level of quality control for what they produce. The real question is how well those quality control processes or procedures actually meet the customer requirements which is usually a breakdown in communicating what is needed by the customer (at least in production companies).
One of the sources below mentions the Ford SQI experiment. One of the outcomes of that effort was the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) supplier manual entitled: Advance Product Quality Planning (APQP). This book is all about how companies and suppliers need to work together prior to production to ensure good quality products are delivered during normal production cycles.
So if a professor in school is asking your question, I would say False due to my real life activities in industry and any number of articles that you can find at ASQ, Quality Digest, Quality Magazine and other sources of information. With that said, I am sure that you can always find a few examples of failure due to lack of quality control, however, even in those situations, I would still content that the root cause was lack of communication versus pure lack of quality.
You may also want to look into the Quality Management System (QMS) stuff at ISO. It always seems to come back to communication between the organization and its suppliers.True or false one key disadvantage of the contractor system of apparel production is lack of quality control?
True. It's always better to build quality into the design and manufacture rather than merely ';inspecting it in'; at the end stage. It's often necessary to station your own inspector at the contractor's site in order to remedy problems ASAP.
TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
False. The Summer Institute for Linguistics (SIL) Ethnologue Survey (1999) lists the following as the top languages by population:
(number of native speakers in parentheses)
Chinese* (937,132,000)
Spanish (332,000,000)
English (322,000,000)
Bengali (189,000,000)
Hindi/Urdu (182,000,000)
Arabic* (174,950,000)
Portuguese (170,000,000)
Russian (170,000,000)
Japanese (125,000,000)
German (98,000,000)
French* (79,572,000)
* The totals given for Chinese, Arabic, and French include more than one SIL variety.TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
False.
Very false.
Mandarin is the most widely spoken language. (Chinese)TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
depends on if you're counting the most PEOPLE speaking it, or the most COUNTRIES having it as the main language
No, we are in 2nd place Chinese Mandarin is the most spoken.
FALSE
not true
(number of native speakers in parentheses)
Chinese* (937,132,000)
Spanish (332,000,000)
English (322,000,000)
Bengali (189,000,000)
Hindi/Urdu (182,000,000)
Arabic* (174,950,000)
Portuguese (170,000,000)
Russian (170,000,000)
Japanese (125,000,000)
German (98,000,000)
French* (79,572,000)
* The totals given for Chinese, Arabic, and French include more than one SIL variety.TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
False.
Very false.
Mandarin is the most widely spoken language. (Chinese)TRUE OR FALSE? Is Spanish the most widely spoken language in the world?
depends on if you're counting the most PEOPLE speaking it, or the most COUNTRIES having it as the main language
No, we are in 2nd place Chinese Mandarin is the most spoken.
FALSE
not true
True or false? When the corporations do badly they're victims of the bad economy & workers, but when Americans?
...are doing badly, it's their own fault for being irresponsible, lazy, and/or dumb? And even though more Americans (workers and the smaller business owners) doing badly altogether has a much bigger impact on the economy than three monopolies that (millions VS about 377,000 or fewer auto workers in the US as of 2006) are wealthy enough to continue to spend billions on advertising cars they don't have, expand, and outsource American jobs--the auto monopolies are deserving of bailouts because their are benefiting the economy while Americans should never be given ';handouts'; (extending their mortgage payments, etc.)?
';At the beginning of 2006, the Big 3 automakers directly employed 377,000 people 鈥?or 8 out of 10 US auto workers.';
http://www.house.gov/dingell/documents/p鈥?/a>True or false? When the corporations do badly they're victims of the bad economy %26amp; workers, but when Americans?
I personally think that nobody should be allowed to fail if they are important enough. Every individual is too important to be allowed to fail, thus, we have welfare, medicaid, and social security. But we also have some institutions that employ too many people to be allowed to fail. You call the auto companies monopolies; there are three, and then the foreign companies. The American manufacturers are just too important to too many people to be allowed to go under. GM would not survive bankruptcy. Bankruptcy requires credit. The credit market isn't large enough currently to hold up GM, much less, the all three.
I think your intuition about things not being fair is right. But as I said, individuals should be helped as well. Two wrongs doesn't make a right. When individuals do badly it is most often not their fault. When companies do, it may more likely be, but they just affect too many people.True or false? When the corporations do badly they're victims of the bad economy %26amp; workers, but when Americans?
You have a point. The standard has to be the same. We have a thin safety net for people not doing well: welfare, medicaid, unemployment benefits. It isn't enough to live well on, but it gets you through the hard times provided you are willing to work when your situation improves. The Big 3 have to be held to the same standards. Yes, we can loan them money, but they have to restructure through a formal Chapter 11, their execs have to go. First in line to receive anything that can be salvaged are the company's customers and retirees, since they have nowhere else to go. Funds have to be set aside to pay for warranties and retirement benefits promised to those who fulfilled their side of the bargain by buying the cars and working a lifetime. Next in line are the employees, who can't all stay, and can't keep the benefits and salaries that receive now. Last are the creditors and shareholders. They get nothing. Without something that drastic, any bailout money will be simply enabling the company executives to keep doing the things that brought us to where we are now.
Yes, but unfortunately the worker's fate is directly tied to the companies- and everyone knows this. It may be morally difficult to determine whether feeding the workers one meal or giving the corporations a great big fishing net is the right thing to do, so to speak. It comes down to practicality. Bail them out if that's what it takes but insist on severe government controls like no more two ton SUV's in a diminishing oil scenario and development of alternative energy vehicles, once and for all and stop supporting the oil agenda.
';At the beginning of 2006, the Big 3 automakers directly employed 377,000 people 鈥?or 8 out of 10 US auto workers.';
http://www.house.gov/dingell/documents/p鈥?/a>True or false? When the corporations do badly they're victims of the bad economy %26amp; workers, but when Americans?
I personally think that nobody should be allowed to fail if they are important enough. Every individual is too important to be allowed to fail, thus, we have welfare, medicaid, and social security. But we also have some institutions that employ too many people to be allowed to fail. You call the auto companies monopolies; there are three, and then the foreign companies. The American manufacturers are just too important to too many people to be allowed to go under. GM would not survive bankruptcy. Bankruptcy requires credit. The credit market isn't large enough currently to hold up GM, much less, the all three.
I think your intuition about things not being fair is right. But as I said, individuals should be helped as well. Two wrongs doesn't make a right. When individuals do badly it is most often not their fault. When companies do, it may more likely be, but they just affect too many people.True or false? When the corporations do badly they're victims of the bad economy %26amp; workers, but when Americans?
You have a point. The standard has to be the same. We have a thin safety net for people not doing well: welfare, medicaid, unemployment benefits. It isn't enough to live well on, but it gets you through the hard times provided you are willing to work when your situation improves. The Big 3 have to be held to the same standards. Yes, we can loan them money, but they have to restructure through a formal Chapter 11, their execs have to go. First in line to receive anything that can be salvaged are the company's customers and retirees, since they have nowhere else to go. Funds have to be set aside to pay for warranties and retirement benefits promised to those who fulfilled their side of the bargain by buying the cars and working a lifetime. Next in line are the employees, who can't all stay, and can't keep the benefits and salaries that receive now. Last are the creditors and shareholders. They get nothing. Without something that drastic, any bailout money will be simply enabling the company executives to keep doing the things that brought us to where we are now.
Yes, but unfortunately the worker's fate is directly tied to the companies- and everyone knows this. It may be morally difficult to determine whether feeding the workers one meal or giving the corporations a great big fishing net is the right thing to do, so to speak. It comes down to practicality. Bail them out if that's what it takes but insist on severe government controls like no more two ton SUV's in a diminishing oil scenario and development of alternative energy vehicles, once and for all and stop supporting the oil agenda.
True Or False: There Is No Such Thing As Cheating If You Don't Get Caught?
And Why?True Or False: There Is No Such Thing As Cheating If You Don't Get Caught?
It's absolutely false. Why? Because it's still cheating and the guilt will most likely eat you up inside. True Or False: There Is No Such Thing As Cheating If You Don't Get Caught?
False.
If you REALLY loved her, you wouldn't be able to live with yourself if you cheated on her. Just because she doesn't know doesn't mean it didn't happen.
False - your still cheating you just didn't get what you deserved for it. A big fat SLAP!
=[]
uh, FALSE!!
because cheating is a sad and pathetic attempt at self-importance
Cheating is Cheating if you get caught or not... it is bad either way...
False!!! Because truth is truth no matter who knows or does not know
False
you will know the truth.. you'd only be kidding yourself...blond hair
It's absolutely false. Why? Because it's still cheating and the guilt will most likely eat you up inside. True Or False: There Is No Such Thing As Cheating If You Don't Get Caught?
False.
If you REALLY loved her, you wouldn't be able to live with yourself if you cheated on her. Just because she doesn't know doesn't mean it didn't happen.
False - your still cheating you just didn't get what you deserved for it. A big fat SLAP!
=[]
uh, FALSE!!
because cheating is a sad and pathetic attempt at self-importance
Cheating is Cheating if you get caught or not... it is bad either way...
False!!! Because truth is truth no matter who knows or does not know
False
you will know the truth.. you'd only be kidding yourself...
True or False questions on birds?
True or False: You can identify a bird by its song or calling.
True or False: Most birds keep the same mate for life.
True or False: By looking at a nest, you can usually identify which bird made it.
True or False: Birds of prey usually swallow their food in pieces.True or False questions on birds?
True all species have very distinctive songs
False MOST birds do not mate for life but SOME do.
True sometimes- some birds make very distinctive nests but you cannot always necessarily ID the nest to a precise species, but at least figureing out which type of bird made it (example: hummingbird, oriole, wren, etc.) is usually easy enough to do.
True- they tear it up with their hooked bills first, however if it is something small enough like a small mouse they may swallow it whole.True or False questions on birds?
1. True. In most cases, you can identify a bird by its song. Some birds sound very similar, so you need a very good ear and lots of practice to get it right.
2. True. Most birds are monogamous, including the penguin and canadian goose.
3. True. Some birds build the traditional nest, others build mounds, others have burrow nests, they also use different materials to build a nest, grass, twigs, etc...
4. False. Birds of prey swallow their food whole because they don't have any teeth.
true (partly to get technical): most birds have one song they sing although there is a few birds that will mimic noises they hear. for instance the lyre mbird of australia can mimic thousands of noises, from other birds to chainsaws, or even the sound of a camera.
true: there is several different species of birds that mate for life, penguins, owls, and ravens. but there are birds that will have several mates like ostriches.
true: most birds build their nests asa safe haven for their babies, but some birds also build their nest to attract mates, like african weaver birds that build their nest from straw, the straw nest hangs from trees with an entrance in the bottom of the nest, the males build them and if the female is satified they will mate, if she isn't satisfied she will destroy the nest forcing the male to start all over.
true: most birds of prey will rip their food to shreds and swallow the peices whole. owls though prefer to eat bite sized meals like mice and sometime other birds and swallow their victims whole.
Some birds can be identified by their call or song but not all. some, but not all birds mate for life. Usually anyone familiar with birds can identify birds by the nest they build but not always. Raptors swallow their food in chunks.
t
t(usually)
t(sometimes)
t/f (most do, but i know vultures don't and some others too)
all true except for the last one, 3rd may differ for different birds
T
T
T/F depending on species
F
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
T
T
F
T
T
F
F
F
T
F
F
T
t
f
t
f
True or False: Most birds keep the same mate for life.
True or False: By looking at a nest, you can usually identify which bird made it.
True or False: Birds of prey usually swallow their food in pieces.True or False questions on birds?
True all species have very distinctive songs
False MOST birds do not mate for life but SOME do.
True sometimes- some birds make very distinctive nests but you cannot always necessarily ID the nest to a precise species, but at least figureing out which type of bird made it (example: hummingbird, oriole, wren, etc.) is usually easy enough to do.
True- they tear it up with their hooked bills first, however if it is something small enough like a small mouse they may swallow it whole.True or False questions on birds?
1. True. In most cases, you can identify a bird by its song. Some birds sound very similar, so you need a very good ear and lots of practice to get it right.
2. True. Most birds are monogamous, including the penguin and canadian goose.
3. True. Some birds build the traditional nest, others build mounds, others have burrow nests, they also use different materials to build a nest, grass, twigs, etc...
4. False. Birds of prey swallow their food whole because they don't have any teeth.
true (partly to get technical): most birds have one song they sing although there is a few birds that will mimic noises they hear. for instance the lyre mbird of australia can mimic thousands of noises, from other birds to chainsaws, or even the sound of a camera.
true: there is several different species of birds that mate for life, penguins, owls, and ravens. but there are birds that will have several mates like ostriches.
true: most birds build their nests asa safe haven for their babies, but some birds also build their nest to attract mates, like african weaver birds that build their nest from straw, the straw nest hangs from trees with an entrance in the bottom of the nest, the males build them and if the female is satified they will mate, if she isn't satisfied she will destroy the nest forcing the male to start all over.
true: most birds of prey will rip their food to shreds and swallow the peices whole. owls though prefer to eat bite sized meals like mice and sometime other birds and swallow their victims whole.
Some birds can be identified by their call or song but not all. some, but not all birds mate for life. Usually anyone familiar with birds can identify birds by the nest they build but not always. Raptors swallow their food in chunks.
t
t(usually)
t(sometimes)
t/f (most do, but i know vultures don't and some others too)
all true except for the last one, 3rd may differ for different birds
T
T
T/F depending on species
F
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
T
T
F
T
T
F
F
F
T
F
F
T
t
f
t
f
True or False - We exploit the character flaws of politicians we don't like and ignore the ones of those we do
Let's be honest now. I have noticed this and I have noticed I am guilty of it myself. Do you agree or disagree?
If you disagree, then what distinguishes an acceptable character flaw from an unacceptable one? In other words, where do YOU draw the line and why? Support your position.True or False - We exploit the character flaws of politicians we don't like and ignore the ones of those we do
I try not to but I'm sure I do. The important things for me are getting the job done in the Middle East, closing our borders, and someone who respects and supports our troops. Obama doesn't do those things and his trip to Europe makes it seem like he wants to be more of a celebrity than our leader and he doesn't seem to love our great country all he does is criticize and never straightly answers a question and gets angry when he is verbally attacked when he does it every day. This is why I support McCain over Obama.
If you have points against mine please tell me I would like to see the other side of things as well.True or False - We exploit the character flaws of politicians we don't like and ignore the ones of those we do
Of course, you see it in every day life. Your friends do something and you make excuses, someone you don't know does the same thing you call for justice, it's human nature to feel safe with what we know and feel unsafe with what we don't.
I try not to.
I draw the line at the point where the character flaws become those unacceptable for a US President. (Like hating the US.)
being a politician is an unacceptable character flaw.
True for our society. But not necessarily on an individual basis.
Not true for me.
If you disagree, then what distinguishes an acceptable character flaw from an unacceptable one? In other words, where do YOU draw the line and why? Support your position.True or False - We exploit the character flaws of politicians we don't like and ignore the ones of those we do
I try not to but I'm sure I do. The important things for me are getting the job done in the Middle East, closing our borders, and someone who respects and supports our troops. Obama doesn't do those things and his trip to Europe makes it seem like he wants to be more of a celebrity than our leader and he doesn't seem to love our great country all he does is criticize and never straightly answers a question and gets angry when he is verbally attacked when he does it every day. This is why I support McCain over Obama.
If you have points against mine please tell me I would like to see the other side of things as well.True or False - We exploit the character flaws of politicians we don't like and ignore the ones of those we do
Of course, you see it in every day life. Your friends do something and you make excuses, someone you don't know does the same thing you call for justice, it's human nature to feel safe with what we know and feel unsafe with what we don't.
I try not to.
I draw the line at the point where the character flaws become those unacceptable for a US President. (Like hating the US.)
being a politician is an unacceptable character flaw.
True for our society. But not necessarily on an individual basis.
Not true for me.
When the moon passes directly between the earth and the sun, it causes a lunar eclipse. Is it true or false?
False; that's a solar eclipse.When the moon passes directly between the earth and the sun, it causes a lunar eclipse. Is it true or false?
FALSE! The earth is actually between the sun and the moon. An eclipse of the Moon (or lunar eclipse) can only occur at Full Moon, and only if the Moon passes through some portion of the Earth's shadow. The shadow is actually composed of two cone-shaped components, one nested inside the other. The outer or penumbral shadow is a zone where the Earth blocks part but not all of the Sun's rays from reaching the Moon. In contrast, the inner or umbral shadow is a region where the Earth blocks all direct sunlight from reaching the Moon.
Check out the website listed.. too cool!When the moon passes directly between the earth and the sun, it causes a lunar eclipse. Is it true or false?
false. its a solar eclipse. a lunar eclipse is when the earth passes between the moon and sun.
it causes a solar eclipse a lunar eclipse is when the sun,Earth,and the moon line up and the Earth casts a shadow on the moon making it red also called the blood moon
false
False. A lunar eclipse is when the earth passes between the moon and the earth.
of cause, it is true.
true
False what you described is a solar eclipse...
For a lunar eclipse the Earth is between the sun and moon.
The party that answered first must feel stupid.
False. That's a solar eclipse.
A lunar eclipse is when the earth comes directly between the moon and the sun. In other words, the moon passed through the earth's shadow.
later edit:
(rookie ... I did not copy your post ... you just beat me with almost the identical post.)
False, a lunar eclipse occurs when the whenever the Sun, Earth and Moon line up exactly. If this occurrence at the time of a Full Moon where the Moon passes through the Earth's shadow a lunar eclipse occurs.
False.
When the moon passes directly between the sun and Earth, it causes a solar eclipse.
When the moon passes through the Earth's shadow (directly opposite the sun), it is a lunar eclipse.
FALSE. It causes SOLAR eclipse.
f
False. that's called a solar eclipse. A lunar eclipse is when the earth's shadow falls on the moon- when the earth is between the moon and the sun.
FALSE, he's right... I was getting myself mixed up... A LUNAR ECLIPSE is when the Earth's shadow blocks the moons reflection of the sun's light.
A SOLAR ECLIPSE is when the moon passes between the Earth and the sun, thus blocking the light coming from the sun.
:o)
FALSE! The earth is actually between the sun and the moon. An eclipse of the Moon (or lunar eclipse) can only occur at Full Moon, and only if the Moon passes through some portion of the Earth's shadow. The shadow is actually composed of two cone-shaped components, one nested inside the other. The outer or penumbral shadow is a zone where the Earth blocks part but not all of the Sun's rays from reaching the Moon. In contrast, the inner or umbral shadow is a region where the Earth blocks all direct sunlight from reaching the Moon.
Check out the website listed.. too cool!When the moon passes directly between the earth and the sun, it causes a lunar eclipse. Is it true or false?
false. its a solar eclipse. a lunar eclipse is when the earth passes between the moon and sun.
it causes a solar eclipse a lunar eclipse is when the sun,Earth,and the moon line up and the Earth casts a shadow on the moon making it red also called the blood moon
false
False. A lunar eclipse is when the earth passes between the moon and the earth.
of cause, it is true.
true
False what you described is a solar eclipse...
For a lunar eclipse the Earth is between the sun and moon.
The party that answered first must feel stupid.
False. That's a solar eclipse.
A lunar eclipse is when the earth comes directly between the moon and the sun. In other words, the moon passed through the earth's shadow.
later edit:
(rookie ... I did not copy your post ... you just beat me with almost the identical post.)
False, a lunar eclipse occurs when the whenever the Sun, Earth and Moon line up exactly. If this occurrence at the time of a Full Moon where the Moon passes through the Earth's shadow a lunar eclipse occurs.
False.
When the moon passes directly between the sun and Earth, it causes a solar eclipse.
When the moon passes through the Earth's shadow (directly opposite the sun), it is a lunar eclipse.
FALSE. It causes SOLAR eclipse.
f
False. that's called a solar eclipse. A lunar eclipse is when the earth's shadow falls on the moon- when the earth is between the moon and the sun.
FALSE, he's right... I was getting myself mixed up... A LUNAR ECLIPSE is when the Earth's shadow blocks the moons reflection of the sun's light.
A SOLAR ECLIPSE is when the moon passes between the Earth and the sun, thus blocking the light coming from the sun.
:o)
True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
My friend said you can get pregnant from having sex with your DAD but I heard that when his sperms enters your body it dies because it knows its in the same blood as he is. So I can't get pregnant from doing stuff with my Dad or I can?
This isn't perverted by the way, don't take it the wrong way/True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
there was a story on the news a year or 2 ago about some father and daughter who fell in love and had 3 kids together.
i think the kids had birth defects and they had a few miscarriages/stillborns too.
but yeh its just as possible to get pregnant from a relative than with anyone else. they just have a very high chance of dying or having defects.
its just wrong..True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
OK, first of all this question does worry me somewhat....
However, your friend is correct. You can get pregnant by your dad or ANY man for that matter. Most likely if you were to have children with your own father, your children would have some sort of disabilities.
You CAN get pregnant from your dad. It's definitely TRUE. That's one reason why there are birth defects... it's called IMBREEDING %26amp; it's illegal. But, yeah, your dad can make you pregnant. So can your brother, uncle, cousin. The sperm don't detect blood types.
If you're planning on doing stuff with your dad, I say this is definitely perverted.
Either way its a dumb fuuking question because we always hear about incest cases when a father rapes his daughter and she becomes pregnant.
Your friend is a moron.
You absolutely can get impregnated by your own father. The baby would have a lot of birth defects, but you'd still have a baby.
Yes you can and unfortunatly there has been many cases.
Yeah you can. Some sick people do.
whoa! incest....anyhoo, yes you can still become pregnant by your dad...he has sperm just like every other male on this planet.
Um...of course you can get pregnant if your dad has sex with you. There are many documented cases of this happening.
If that were true then Southern Senators would be a lot more fanatical about abortion laws...
You CAN get pregnant from you Dad. It's called incest.
Yes, you can. And how can we not take it the wrong way? That's a sick question.
Yes you can still get pregnant. But this is still Fu%26amp;ked up!
Yes you can.... but its sick to even think about things like that tbh
yes you can..he has sperm so its possible
yea you can one of my friend did!...is so damn sick! but its happened
you still can get pregnant. and eww why would u ask such a question anyways?
please go to the police and tell them if that is what is going on it is incest... very illegal
This isn't perverted by the way, don't take it the wrong way/True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
there was a story on the news a year or 2 ago about some father and daughter who fell in love and had 3 kids together.
i think the kids had birth defects and they had a few miscarriages/stillborns too.
but yeh its just as possible to get pregnant from a relative than with anyone else. they just have a very high chance of dying or having defects.
its just wrong..True or False: Your Dad can make you pregnant?
OK, first of all this question does worry me somewhat....
However, your friend is correct. You can get pregnant by your dad or ANY man for that matter. Most likely if you were to have children with your own father, your children would have some sort of disabilities.
You CAN get pregnant from your dad. It's definitely TRUE. That's one reason why there are birth defects... it's called IMBREEDING %26amp; it's illegal. But, yeah, your dad can make you pregnant. So can your brother, uncle, cousin. The sperm don't detect blood types.
If you're planning on doing stuff with your dad, I say this is definitely perverted.
Either way its a dumb fuuking question because we always hear about incest cases when a father rapes his daughter and she becomes pregnant.
Your friend is a moron.
You absolutely can get impregnated by your own father. The baby would have a lot of birth defects, but you'd still have a baby.
Yes you can and unfortunatly there has been many cases.
Yeah you can. Some sick people do.
whoa! incest....anyhoo, yes you can still become pregnant by your dad...he has sperm just like every other male on this planet.
Um...of course you can get pregnant if your dad has sex with you. There are many documented cases of this happening.
If that were true then Southern Senators would be a lot more fanatical about abortion laws...
You CAN get pregnant from you Dad. It's called incest.
Yes, you can. And how can we not take it the wrong way? That's a sick question.
Yes you can still get pregnant. But this is still Fu%26amp;ked up!
Yes you can.... but its sick to even think about things like that tbh
yes you can..he has sperm so its possible
yea you can one of my friend did!...is so damn sick! but its happened
you still can get pregnant. and eww why would u ask such a question anyways?
please go to the police and tell them if that is what is going on it is incest... very illegal
True or false: ';Dogs have masters; cats have servants';?
dogs think '; he takes care of me and feeds me, he must be a god. cats think :he takes care of me and feeds me I must be a god.';True or false: ';Dogs have masters; cats have servants';?
someone else put women like cats and men like dogs. suppose it relates quite well to your comment. hope thats not sexist!!!
True or false: ';Dogs have masters; cats have servants';?
Sounds true; however, I've been a servant to dogs and a master to cats too.
In most cases Very True :)
no, dogs have friends and cats think they are better than dogs and call their friends servants
True, I am both a master and a servant lol
I think TRUE! I love all my animals very much but I find that my dog is always interested in what I'm doing and wants to please me, while my cat seems to give off a vibe that says ';Feed me! Pet me! Then set me on my chenille blanket and leave me alone.'; But I think cats sassy attitudes are cute. :)
True. Dogs obey you and cats kinda do their own thing.
So,So, true! :)
False... except in grafield 2! LOL i saw it with my little sister.
Not only do they have servents, they have staff!!!
True
Have u ever seen a cat play fetch LOL
YES THAT IS TRUE CATS RULE, DOGS DROOL
I think we are servants to them both.Most people serve their animals and love them so much they treat them with greater respects than humans sometimes,but we do it out of love and most times we don't realize we're treating our pets better than ourselves.I love my animals!
I'd have to say pretty much true.
some what
haha yes, sadly, seems to be very true.
One day while in the back yard me and my two dogs were playing Ball Ball who's got the ball, I usually throw the ball at the garage , have it bounce off and the dogs chase it. Lately what has been happening is, I throw the ball at the garage and the dogs watch where it goes and then just lay down in the back yard and ....watch you know who will shag the ball..( me )
So I ask you... who is training whom here. .?
HAHA. Definitely true.
someone told me once: ';you're no one until you've been ignored by a cat.'; :)
True.
Clearly, you've never had a cat,
or you'd know the answer to that.
Hum. In the case of my cats and dogs-I would say that I am a servent to both of them...
very true
True.
Man is a dog's idea of what God should be.
~Holbrook Jackson~
If you get to thinking you're a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else's dog around.
~Will Rogers~
True. :D
someone else put women like cats and men like dogs. suppose it relates quite well to your comment. hope thats not sexist!!!
Report Abuse
True or false: ';Dogs have masters; cats have servants';?
Sounds true; however, I've been a servant to dogs and a master to cats too.
In most cases Very True :)
no, dogs have friends and cats think they are better than dogs and call their friends servants
True, I am both a master and a servant lol
I think TRUE! I love all my animals very much but I find that my dog is always interested in what I'm doing and wants to please me, while my cat seems to give off a vibe that says ';Feed me! Pet me! Then set me on my chenille blanket and leave me alone.'; But I think cats sassy attitudes are cute. :)
True. Dogs obey you and cats kinda do their own thing.
So,So, true! :)
False... except in grafield 2! LOL i saw it with my little sister.
Not only do they have servents, they have staff!!!
True
Have u ever seen a cat play fetch LOL
YES THAT IS TRUE CATS RULE, DOGS DROOL
I think we are servants to them both.Most people serve their animals and love them so much they treat them with greater respects than humans sometimes,but we do it out of love and most times we don't realize we're treating our pets better than ourselves.I love my animals!
I'd have to say pretty much true.
some what
haha yes, sadly, seems to be very true.
One day while in the back yard me and my two dogs were playing Ball Ball who's got the ball, I usually throw the ball at the garage , have it bounce off and the dogs chase it. Lately what has been happening is, I throw the ball at the garage and the dogs watch where it goes and then just lay down in the back yard and ....watch you know who will shag the ball..( me )
So I ask you... who is training whom here. .?
HAHA. Definitely true.
someone told me once: ';you're no one until you've been ignored by a cat.'; :)
True.
Clearly, you've never had a cat,
or you'd know the answer to that.
Hum. In the case of my cats and dogs-I would say that I am a servent to both of them...
very true
True.
Man is a dog's idea of what God should be.
~Holbrook Jackson~
If you get to thinking you're a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else's dog around.
~Will Rogers~
True. :D
True or False: You can never act the same around someone when they cross the borderline into your dreams?
True...True or False: You can never act the same around someone when they cross the borderline into your dreams?
thats definitely true i think.
i mean...i always dream about people...but i always blush around them when im actually near themTrue or False: You can never act the same around someone when they cross the borderline into your dreams?
Usually true, though it depends who the person is and what kind of dream it was lol. Good question...I never thought about that before!
I think it depends on how lucid your dream is but yeah, it has happened to me
Kinda True
True. Been there, done that, got the broken heart.
True
True
True for me. Even if I don't like them.
False - it's a dream, not reality
true
true
falseblond hair
thats definitely true i think.
i mean...i always dream about people...but i always blush around them when im actually near themTrue or False: You can never act the same around someone when they cross the borderline into your dreams?
Usually true, though it depends who the person is and what kind of dream it was lol. Good question...I never thought about that before!
I think it depends on how lucid your dream is but yeah, it has happened to me
Kinda True
True. Been there, done that, got the broken heart.
True
True
True for me. Even if I don't like them.
False - it's a dream, not reality
true
true
false
True or False: We get up everyday and do mostly stupid things all day long?
i would go straight to hell.......
.......if i deny this....True or False: We get up everyday and do mostly stupid things all day long?
Well that is probably true due to the fact that the two most common things in the entire universe are Hydrogen and Stupidity,and it's not that were all so dumb,it's that we all have a command of thoroughly useless information. And the trouble with ignorance is that it picks up confidence as it goes along.True or False: We get up everyday and do mostly stupid things all day long?
*reaches for keyboard to answer, spills coffee, runs to get towel, stubs paw, jumps around cursing in pain, remembers towel, wipes up coffee, sits back down looks at keypad trying to remember what she was doing...* Dangit! Well Hi stranger...Miss you much!!!
True... if we get behind the wheel, most here are not saints ! But there are times during the day when I see a ray of hope in mankind... and it gives me reassurance that fools can be serious every now and then !
Sigh
Everything I do is stupid so.. true.
';Stupid is as stupid does';
eh?
;)
I try to be productive and constructive everyday. I get waylaid by stupid people.
False... I do boring things A L L D A Y L O N G
Not only this is true, but sometimes my dreams are equally stupid !
50/50
True.
sometimes
*hangs head* true
the key word here being ';mostly';
thanks for having my back. we miss you.
true
100%
yes, most people do
False...well, I don't....can't speak for you or anyone else
Yes
I am on here wasting time aren't I???
most of the time, i haven't found my purpose yet.
.......if i deny this....True or False: We get up everyday and do mostly stupid things all day long?
Well that is probably true due to the fact that the two most common things in the entire universe are Hydrogen and Stupidity,and it's not that were all so dumb,it's that we all have a command of thoroughly useless information. And the trouble with ignorance is that it picks up confidence as it goes along.True or False: We get up everyday and do mostly stupid things all day long?
*reaches for keyboard to answer, spills coffee, runs to get towel, stubs paw, jumps around cursing in pain, remembers towel, wipes up coffee, sits back down looks at keypad trying to remember what she was doing...* Dangit! Well Hi stranger...Miss you much!!!
True... if we get behind the wheel, most here are not saints ! But there are times during the day when I see a ray of hope in mankind... and it gives me reassurance that fools can be serious every now and then !
Sigh
Everything I do is stupid so.. true.
';Stupid is as stupid does';
eh?
;)
I try to be productive and constructive everyday. I get waylaid by stupid people.
False... I do boring things A L L D A Y L O N G
Not only this is true, but sometimes my dreams are equally stupid !
50/50
True.
sometimes
*hangs head* true
the key word here being ';mostly';
thanks for having my back. we miss you.
true
100%
yes, most people do
False...well, I don't....can't speak for you or anyone else
Yes
I am on here wasting time aren't I???
most of the time, i haven't found my purpose yet.
True or False. Washington and his troops crossed the deleware river and drove the enemy from philadelphia.?
False. George Washington crossed the Delaware and defeated the Hessians at Trenton on Christmas Day, 1776.
I hope that this has been a help to you.True or False. Washington and his troops crossed the deleware river and drove the enemy from philadelphia.?
Thank you for choosing my answer as the best.
True or False. Washington and his troops crossed the deleware river and drove the enemy from philadelphia.?
false
check the link below on the battle of trenton
Is this your homework?
All these answers are out there just for the searching.
I hope that this has been a help to you.True or False. Washington and his troops crossed the deleware river and drove the enemy from philadelphia.?
Thank you for choosing my answer as the best.
Report Abuse
True or False. Washington and his troops crossed the deleware river and drove the enemy from philadelphia.?
false
check the link below on the battle of trenton
Is this your homework?
All these answers are out there just for the searching.
True or false=men in general are thoughtful, compassionate, loyal, and truthful?
To be fair, the same rule applies to girls.
More so the ones who know their attractive and flick off guys like its a sport.True or false=men in general are thoughtful, compassionate, loyal, and truthful?
True and it can be applied to everyone, not just men. But the world changes men with its messages of 'superiority', 'masculinity', and 'indestructibilty', After a while and unknowingly, these messages can and often will change how a man behaves: we start to believe that we are above equality, that we need to prove ourselves as men in certain fashions, and that we shouldn't show weakness. Teachings like that diminish our truer qualities of thoughtfulness, compassion, loyalty, and honesty. Further more, I have found that those men that have given into the wrong messages have also ruined that image, not only for themselves, but for the other men as well, giving good reason for women to believe that we are alike. But certainly, what you asked is true for a time, and there are some men that are still that way, and I would like to believe that I am too. I hope that answers your question.True or false=men in general are thoughtful, compassionate, loyal, and truthful?
Come on for the most part that's false. they are users and think more of themselves then other people or should I say females.
Take your pick
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=spo鈥?/a>
Dazed and confused, Oh your so right boys become men an time becomes wisdom. I know you yougins like the music you can't understand or maybe it's just me but here's one for you, chow I love this song.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ct2L-PYYU鈥?/a>
This isn't a true or false thing one can answer. Men are just like women in that some are as you say and some are not. I think that men are in general just as all of the above that you mentioned as
women are. It about equals out even.
Ummm True. On the outside men often give the look and sometimes feel that they are tought guys and jerks but that is a cover up because most are on the inside thoughtful, compassionate, loyal, and the good ones are truthful.
ot depends on how old is the guy, its much more common in older men b/c they have seen it all and been thru it all, older cats know what it takes to be a real man towards a woman b/c they know what they want and looking for.
FALSE, but it does depend on their age, under 30, no way most men don't care about anything except themselves. Over 30 then most will come around and start to be more normal, or more like girls are starting at about 16.
You seem to be more compassionate than thoughtful towards your brothers than they deserve
A lot of men aren't, a lot of men are. You can't generalize on something like personality.
TRUE-thoughtful (they buy u the cheapest things,it's the thoughts that counts they say)... FALSE-loyal(they exchange you for those cheapest girls..)
I am, though if your going to ask in a forum full of ladies, i bet i can guess the responses.
lol.
older men..maybe true
but...younger men..that's a big FALSE
and by younger I mean..like 18-ish.
F-A-L-S-E
PERIOD!!!!!!!
false...for the majority
True only in dream.
false. i have known tons of guys who are just azzez.
FALSE...
FALSE
False:))))))
FALSE!!!!!!
FALSE!! but in some very rare cases they are!
true
false
hell no
More so the ones who know their attractive and flick off guys like its a sport.True or false=men in general are thoughtful, compassionate, loyal, and truthful?
True and it can be applied to everyone, not just men. But the world changes men with its messages of 'superiority', 'masculinity', and 'indestructibilty', After a while and unknowingly, these messages can and often will change how a man behaves: we start to believe that we are above equality, that we need to prove ourselves as men in certain fashions, and that we shouldn't show weakness. Teachings like that diminish our truer qualities of thoughtfulness, compassion, loyalty, and honesty. Further more, I have found that those men that have given into the wrong messages have also ruined that image, not only for themselves, but for the other men as well, giving good reason for women to believe that we are alike. But certainly, what you asked is true for a time, and there are some men that are still that way, and I would like to believe that I am too. I hope that answers your question.True or false=men in general are thoughtful, compassionate, loyal, and truthful?
Come on for the most part that's false. they are users and think more of themselves then other people or should I say females.
Take your pick
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=spo鈥?/a>
Dazed and confused, Oh your so right boys become men an time becomes wisdom. I know you yougins like the music you can't understand or maybe it's just me but here's one for you, chow I love this song.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ct2L-PYYU鈥?/a>
This isn't a true or false thing one can answer. Men are just like women in that some are as you say and some are not. I think that men are in general just as all of the above that you mentioned as
women are. It about equals out even.
Ummm True. On the outside men often give the look and sometimes feel that they are tought guys and jerks but that is a cover up because most are on the inside thoughtful, compassionate, loyal, and the good ones are truthful.
ot depends on how old is the guy, its much more common in older men b/c they have seen it all and been thru it all, older cats know what it takes to be a real man towards a woman b/c they know what they want and looking for.
FALSE, but it does depend on their age, under 30, no way most men don't care about anything except themselves. Over 30 then most will come around and start to be more normal, or more like girls are starting at about 16.
You seem to be more compassionate than thoughtful towards your brothers than they deserve
A lot of men aren't, a lot of men are. You can't generalize on something like personality.
TRUE-thoughtful (they buy u the cheapest things,it's the thoughts that counts they say)... FALSE-loyal(they exchange you for those cheapest girls..)
I am, though if your going to ask in a forum full of ladies, i bet i can guess the responses.
lol.
older men..maybe true
but...younger men..that's a big FALSE
and by younger I mean..like 18-ish.
F-A-L-S-E
PERIOD!!!!!!!
false...for the majority
True only in dream.
false. i have known tons of guys who are just azzez.
FALSE...
FALSE
False:))))))
FALSE!!!!!!
FALSE!! but in some very rare cases they are!
true
false
hell no
Please help! Is this statement true or false? What's true and false, and why?
How is this statement true or false, and to what extent:
';All strong and weak chemical forces result from the attraction of opposition charges, therefore they are all approximately the same strength.';Please help! Is this statement true or false? What's true and false, and why?
false. All attractions are not necessarily between oppositely charged particles. You may find covelent bonds which are formed due to sharing of pair of electrons. And metallic bonds due to collective sharing of free electrons.Please help! Is this statement true or false? What's true and false, and why?
False...
For example, van der waals forces (aka london forces) between the electrons of one molecule and the protons of the other molecue is MUCH weaker than hydrogen bonding forces.
';All strong and weak chemical forces result from the attraction of opposition charges, therefore they are all approximately the same strength.';Please help! Is this statement true or false? What's true and false, and why?
false. All attractions are not necessarily between oppositely charged particles. You may find covelent bonds which are formed due to sharing of pair of electrons. And metallic bonds due to collective sharing of free electrons.Please help! Is this statement true or false? What's true and false, and why?
False...
For example, van der waals forces (aka london forces) between the electrons of one molecule and the protons of the other molecue is MUCH weaker than hydrogen bonding forces.
True or false: Christians learn to be religious before they learn to be rational.?
True or false: non-believers learn to be rude before they know better?
Answer to your rude question: No. Many believers come to the saving knowledge of the Messiah as adults. That's because it takes us awhile to realize that we need Him.
D1True or false: Christians learn to be religious before they learn to be rational.?
If you taught a little kid how to add some simple and small numbers like, what 2+2 is, what 5+5 is, etc. etc. I think most people would think that that was good %26amp; nice as long as it wasn't forced on him/her.
So why would it be wrong to teach the child in an easy, not forceful, manner about God? The child's faith is the most important thing that will ever take place in his/her life.True or false: Christians learn to be religious before they learn to be rational.?
True. I babysit for these kids, the youngest is 3, and he was singing a Jesus song... I mean, talk about brainwashing.
The two characteristics are not mutually exclusive... but then, you don't accept that fact. Therefore your premise is invalid.
Forgive others as I have forgiven you.
You have to rational to be a Christian..
Wow. You're really smart!
False, I came to Christ as an adult.
Answer to your rude question: No. Many believers come to the saving knowledge of the Messiah as adults. That's because it takes us awhile to realize that we need Him.
D1True or false: Christians learn to be religious before they learn to be rational.?
If you taught a little kid how to add some simple and small numbers like, what 2+2 is, what 5+5 is, etc. etc. I think most people would think that that was good %26amp; nice as long as it wasn't forced on him/her.
So why would it be wrong to teach the child in an easy, not forceful, manner about God? The child's faith is the most important thing that will ever take place in his/her life.True or false: Christians learn to be religious before they learn to be rational.?
True. I babysit for these kids, the youngest is 3, and he was singing a Jesus song... I mean, talk about brainwashing.
The two characteristics are not mutually exclusive... but then, you don't accept that fact. Therefore your premise is invalid.
Forgive others as I have forgiven you.
You have to rational to be a Christian..
Wow. You're really smart!
False, I came to Christ as an adult.
True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
While some might want some side action, I think the majority would simply be complimenting you on your charm, wit and artistic nature.
**EDIT** Whoa, I don't know if I want to play here... these peeps are kind of mean!True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
This depends on where you work. If you work in a chicken factory, this might mean they want you. Otherwise, false.
Rooster in a hen house.True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
It means ure probably charming...but in a humours way where there is no harm..therefor false..they get it...and so do u Rrrrrrico......80's hittttttttt Swaaavvvvveeeeeeiiiiiiiii,.
Only if you are female yourself.
No,but watch for other hints.If she wants it,she won't stop there.
Listen to waht was said by Puppy Calzone. Not at work dude, not at work....
False! Just a little humor in the office
Yeah its more like flirting. She is definitely giving you your props if she likes Latin Lovers!
It means they're laughing at you in Spanish.
No.
Maybe, but they are probably making fun of you.
No. They are making fun of you right to your face.
false they're just having fun (having a joke with you)
No, it means they are making fun of you.
Yes, I think you should go for it!
**EDIT** Whoa, I don't know if I want to play here... these peeps are kind of mean!True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
This depends on where you work. If you work in a chicken factory, this might mean they want you. Otherwise, false.
Rooster in a hen house.True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
It means ure probably charming...but in a humours way where there is no harm..therefor false..they get it...and so do u Rrrrrrico......80's hittttttttt Swaaavvvvveeeeeeiiiiiiiii,.
Only if you are female yourself.
No,but watch for other hints.If she wants it,she won't stop there.
Listen to waht was said by Puppy Calzone. Not at work dude, not at work....
False! Just a little humor in the office
Yeah its more like flirting. She is definitely giving you your props if she likes Latin Lovers!
It means they're laughing at you in Spanish.
No.
Maybe, but they are probably making fun of you.
No. They are making fun of you right to your face.
false they're just having fun (having a joke with you)
No, it means they are making fun of you.
Yes, I think you should go for it!
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
True or false, micro braids pull your hair out?
i see more and more girls wearing Micro Braids. i was always thinkin that they pull your hair out. but now people tell me it helps their hair grow. is that true?True or false, micro braids pull your hair out?
I think that what pulls the hair out is that they leave the braids in for too long and when they comb out their hair once they take the braids down in the process of combing out the knots they also comb out alot of their hair.
Plus the get them braided too tight to begin with and they wind up with alopecia!True or false, micro braids pull your hair out?
Those type of braid period break your hair off. I've had several kinds in my lifetime and that's all they did to me was break off my hair. Some look real cute for the moment, but really there is not much benefit from it. They told me that it would help my hair grow also, but that was a long while back and it didn't. Just recently, I've been leaving my hair natural (with a relaxer here and there), but I've been getting my tips trimmed and keeping my hair moist with Luster's Pink Lotion and Isoplus oil sheen and my hair has thickened and grew so fast.
Yes, if braided too tightly and too close to the scalp, micro-braids can pull some hair out and also cause mild to severe headaches. They do not make the hair grow any faster, but may stretch it, and that isn't good.
,.
I believe they pull your hair out, ESPECIALLY if you get relaxers/perms often. I see lots of people with them who have them too tight, %26amp; they're bald on the sides.
true i had them , and ow, and u loose hair bt not a lot. go with ur fro
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AijRhorP6iHdtYAVw3lQnd3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20081006174620AAUtNIz
i love mine
I think that what pulls the hair out is that they leave the braids in for too long and when they comb out their hair once they take the braids down in the process of combing out the knots they also comb out alot of their hair.
Plus the get them braided too tight to begin with and they wind up with alopecia!True or false, micro braids pull your hair out?
Those type of braid period break your hair off. I've had several kinds in my lifetime and that's all they did to me was break off my hair. Some look real cute for the moment, but really there is not much benefit from it. They told me that it would help my hair grow also, but that was a long while back and it didn't. Just recently, I've been leaving my hair natural (with a relaxer here and there), but I've been getting my tips trimmed and keeping my hair moist with Luster's Pink Lotion and Isoplus oil sheen and my hair has thickened and grew so fast.
Yes, if braided too tightly and too close to the scalp, micro-braids can pull some hair out and also cause mild to severe headaches. They do not make the hair grow any faster, but may stretch it, and that isn't good.
,.
I believe they pull your hair out, ESPECIALLY if you get relaxers/perms often. I see lots of people with them who have them too tight, %26amp; they're bald on the sides.
true i had them , and ow, and u loose hair bt not a lot. go with ur fro
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AijRhorP6iHdtYAVw3lQnd3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20081006174620AAUtNIz
i love mine
True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
True. Unfortunately, too many Bush haters on this site call our troops murderers, baby killers, etc. That's pathetic.True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
True. Soldiers join the military to protect their country, their homes, and their families. So if they are to die in war, we'd better make d*mned sure that they do it for the reason they joined in the first place.
It is no support of soldiers to cheer them on to their deaths when they are doing it for someone else's personal vendettas and lust for oil.
I don't want any soldiers dying, but if it is to happen then we must make sure they are doing so for the reasons they were willing to risk their lives in the first place.True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
FALSE How can you support the troops when you tell them at every turn that they are doing wrong and you are in opposition to them doing their duty,if you are opposed to the war you are opposed to the troops and make this argument for no other reason then do disassociate yourself from the controversy, your support has been misguided, you push for their care out of guilt and you patronize them through false patriotism you look at the war as being wrong and at the soldier who fights it as if he were a victim that requires your sympathy and compassion you act in their behalf only because it gives you an opportunity to lash out or criticize the administration that you oppose. No you can not you either support all or your a hypocrite. you are embarrassed because the troops are better men and women then you, they are all volunteers not draftees and they would not volunteer if they did not support the cause. they have nothing but contempt for those who would straddle the fence in their eyes you are a coward for not taking a stand one way or the other there is no middle. and don't bother with the they only enlisted for the job or the school crap they would have to be brain dead idiots to belive they joined the military to do anything but fight. Only Micheal Moore could come up with some bs like that.
The troops are humans that joined a military that they want to help defend and protect but they can not even tell you where they will be. Its the goverment thats there boss and they have no coice or else jail. THey are doing there job, They should not be picked on for that! No one should for doing a honest days work!! Honest!! Its honest so its cool. I hate though when they come back and the chose to join they expect to get a job over you! My niece did and I hated that!!
true...
why shouldn't you be there for the soldiers that is your brother, sister, husband, wife, etc... its like saying i dont like what your doing but i'll support you and be there for you.
True - we'll soon be patching them up for years to come when we get them out of that mideast sh*t hole. Can't happen quick enough for me.
Then Li'l Bushy goes to prison.
';OH NO! I'm FOR the war, I'm just against the troops!';
-Bill Hicks
My sister is VERY patriotic. She supports the troops, but not this war.
TRUE!!!!!
True:By support you mean bringen' em' home =)
True. Soldiers join the military to protect their country, their homes, and their families. So if they are to die in war, we'd better make d*mned sure that they do it for the reason they joined in the first place.
It is no support of soldiers to cheer them on to their deaths when they are doing it for someone else's personal vendettas and lust for oil.
I don't want any soldiers dying, but if it is to happen then we must make sure they are doing so for the reasons they were willing to risk their lives in the first place.True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
FALSE How can you support the troops when you tell them at every turn that they are doing wrong and you are in opposition to them doing their duty,if you are opposed to the war you are opposed to the troops and make this argument for no other reason then do disassociate yourself from the controversy, your support has been misguided, you push for their care out of guilt and you patronize them through false patriotism you look at the war as being wrong and at the soldier who fights it as if he were a victim that requires your sympathy and compassion you act in their behalf only because it gives you an opportunity to lash out or criticize the administration that you oppose. No you can not you either support all or your a hypocrite. you are embarrassed because the troops are better men and women then you, they are all volunteers not draftees and they would not volunteer if they did not support the cause. they have nothing but contempt for those who would straddle the fence in their eyes you are a coward for not taking a stand one way or the other there is no middle. and don't bother with the they only enlisted for the job or the school crap they would have to be brain dead idiots to belive they joined the military to do anything but fight. Only Micheal Moore could come up with some bs like that.
The troops are humans that joined a military that they want to help defend and protect but they can not even tell you where they will be. Its the goverment thats there boss and they have no coice or else jail. THey are doing there job, They should not be picked on for that! No one should for doing a honest days work!! Honest!! Its honest so its cool. I hate though when they come back and the chose to join they expect to get a job over you! My niece did and I hated that!!
true...
why shouldn't you be there for the soldiers that is your brother, sister, husband, wife, etc... its like saying i dont like what your doing but i'll support you and be there for you.
True - we'll soon be patching them up for years to come when we get them out of that mideast sh*t hole. Can't happen quick enough for me.
Then Li'l Bushy goes to prison.
';OH NO! I'm FOR the war, I'm just against the troops!';
-Bill Hicks
My sister is VERY patriotic. She supports the troops, but not this war.
TRUE!!!!!
True:By support you mean bringen' em' home =)
True or False: You know at least one person that Never Ever watches television?
I know a number of people who do not watch television. I know dozens of people who don't even own a television.True or False: You know at least one person that Never Ever watches television?
yes. they spend most of their time working at a job they hate to provide for their family and the rest of the time sleeping, paying bills, and reading the news paper.True or False: You know at least one person that Never Ever watches television?
I have a friend who is Amish they do not even have electric in the house. But you know its one house that you love to visit. Its peaceful.I wish I could do it
false.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
answer mine?
True.
My neighbour. She is, well, different.
True. I have a friend who's parent's are psychiatrists who study effects of TV on the brain and don't let their son watch it.
True,
My psychology teacher.
She's a weirdo
um definitely false!
true.
her step mom won't let her.
false... EVERYONE *I* know watches tv
True
%26lt;--- :)
False
*heavy sigh* true. I feel sorry for him
False, because even if you're walking by a store then you see it on, that still counts....or you tube.
False.
True, she doesn't own a TV.
True.
I don't and neither does my son that two- cable companies are going to price themselves right out of business!
True....a few....!!
true
false
true
true
false
true. one of my dance teachers hasn't even owned a tv in five years.
false.
I am. I watch only movies by Netflix on comp. hate ads
i dont
heck no!!
A guy I met in India.
true
(does my teacher count?) lol
yes. they spend most of their time working at a job they hate to provide for their family and the rest of the time sleeping, paying bills, and reading the news paper.True or False: You know at least one person that Never Ever watches television?
I have a friend who is Amish they do not even have electric in the house. But you know its one house that you love to visit. Its peaceful.I wish I could do it
false.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
answer mine?
True.
My neighbour. She is, well, different.
True. I have a friend who's parent's are psychiatrists who study effects of TV on the brain and don't let their son watch it.
True,
My psychology teacher.
She's a weirdo
um definitely false!
true.
her step mom won't let her.
false... EVERYONE *I* know watches tv
True
%26lt;--- :)
False
*heavy sigh* true. I feel sorry for him
False, because even if you're walking by a store then you see it on, that still counts....or you tube.
False.
True, she doesn't own a TV.
True.
I don't and neither does my son that two- cable companies are going to price themselves right out of business!
True....a few....!!
true
false
true
true
false
true. one of my dance teachers hasn't even owned a tv in five years.
false.
I am. I watch only movies by Netflix on comp. hate ads
i dont
heck no!!
A guy I met in India.
true
(does my teacher count?) lol
True or False, Does an equilateral triangle have two equal sides?
Definitely not false and partially true. It actually has 3 equal sides.True or False, Does an equilateral triangle have two equal sides?
its 3 sides are equalTrue or False, Does an equilateral triangle have two equal sides?
True, but it's three equal sides.
yes, as long as you don't mean exactly 2. it has 3 equal sides, so clearly any 2 of them will be equal.
False a equilateral triangle has 3 equal sides
it has 3 equal sides. An Isosceles triangle has two equal sides.
three equal sides. You're thinking of an isicolis triangle.
true and false see it has 3 equal sides
yes. it actually has three equal sides, therefore it has two. trick question.
its 3 sides are equalTrue or False, Does an equilateral triangle have two equal sides?
True, but it's three equal sides.
yes, as long as you don't mean exactly 2. it has 3 equal sides, so clearly any 2 of them will be equal.
False a equilateral triangle has 3 equal sides
it has 3 equal sides. An Isosceles triangle has two equal sides.
three equal sides. You're thinking of an isicolis triangle.
true and false see it has 3 equal sides
yes. it actually has three equal sides, therefore it has two. trick question.
True or false schools can adopt specific rules and regulations not covered in the code of conduct?
true or false schools can adopt specific rules and regulations not covered in the code of conductTrue or false schools can adopt specific rules and regulations not covered in the code of conduct?
If they adopt a specific rule or regulation that affects the code of conduct, then they'll just have to amend the code to reflect the changes/additions.blond hair
If they adopt a specific rule or regulation that affects the code of conduct, then they'll just have to amend the code to reflect the changes/additions.
True or False - Mestizos were the highest social group in latin american colonies?
this has to do with the age of reform - the 1800's through the 1900'sTrue or False - Mestizos were the highest social group in latin american colonies?
False.
The social classes were roughly:
Peninsulares
Criolles
Mestizos
Indios
In reality it was much more complicated, since this scheme does not take into account Africans or the many subcategories of Mestizos.True or False - Mestizos were the highest social group in latin american colonies?
False
False.
The social classes were roughly:
Peninsulares
Criolles
Mestizos
Indios
In reality it was much more complicated, since this scheme does not take into account Africans or the many subcategories of Mestizos.True or False - Mestizos were the highest social group in latin american colonies?
False
True or false wind is reported on sea from the direction its blowing to?
Wind is officially reported as the direction it is blowing FROM (i.e: a ';westerly'; wind is coming from the west and moving towards the east).True or false wind is reported on sea from the direction its blowing to?
Wind direction is where the wind blows from.
Current direction is where the current is going to.
Position reporting is always from your location. For example, you must say: I am north of the lighthouse and not: the lighthouse is south of me.
Those three points are the basic of IAMSAR terminology, the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue.True or false wind is reported on sea from the direction its blowing to?
False. A sailor concerned of a ';nor'easter'; is concerned about the surface sea conditions when the wind blows from the north east.
it come sfrom the ocan.
Il l;ive in las vegas and pacific ocean determies our days.
I think it may be where it is blowing FROM.
Wind direction is where the wind blows from.
Current direction is where the current is going to.
Position reporting is always from your location. For example, you must say: I am north of the lighthouse and not: the lighthouse is south of me.
Those three points are the basic of IAMSAR terminology, the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue.True or false wind is reported on sea from the direction its blowing to?
False. A sailor concerned of a ';nor'easter'; is concerned about the surface sea conditions when the wind blows from the north east.
it come sfrom the ocan.
Il l;ive in las vegas and pacific ocean determies our days.
I think it may be where it is blowing FROM.
True or false loan questions: i must pay back my loans with accrued interest and any deducted fees?
and 2
i may prepay all or part of my loans without penaltyTrue or false loan questions: i must pay back my loans with accrued interest and any deducted fees?
It all depends on what is written into your loan contract. Study the documents carefully.
i may prepay all or part of my loans without penaltyTrue or false loan questions: i must pay back my loans with accrued interest and any deducted fees?
It all depends on what is written into your loan contract. Study the documents carefully.
True or False: The main thing you care about is sex and money when getting into relationships?
A friend of mines says that the main thing people care about is sex and money. Is my friend right about this?True or False: The main thing you care about is sex and money when getting into relationships?
Well... I have read the answers before mine and it looks unanimous that she/he is wrong.
My answer: False
My advice: If your friend has this deep an opinion on the subject, I think he/she needs to change their choice in friends.
I once heard a song (Sure wish I knew its name and who the singer was) and one of the verses went (Something) like this....
There was a pig lying in the ditch, a drunk came down the road and lay beside it. An old lady came down the road and said, you can tell who boozes by the company he choozes and the pig got up and slowly walked away.
I think you can figure out the moral here and it applies to your friend. You view the world by the part of the world you see and live in, if the view is bad, than it is up to you to change your view. Choose a better class of people to hang with and you will start to see why so many here are saying false.
Food for thought...
If what your friend says is true, than why are there so many successful marriages out there? I know all you hear is about the bad ones, people often like to talk negative and misery, but there are plenty of happy, successful marriages out there, you just don't hear about them much, they don't get in the news.
I am married to my bestest friend. We didn't used to be that way. We almost divorced several times. A good marriage or relationship takes a lot of hard work. It takes giving to your partner, not taking. It takes mentally supporting your partner and building them up., NEVER tearing them down.
If you are not going to put into it more than you hope to get out of it, you will not have a really good relationship, they don't just happen.
There are some who put everything they have into it and get nothing but a kick in the butt out of it. - Problem is... Marry in haste, repent in leisure.
Slow down, take your time, get to know each other. Build a strong friendship over time before jumping into the sack together. Than when you do take it to the next level, you have already built a solid foundation to support what you build together on top of it.True or False: The main thing you care about is sex and money when getting into relationships?
false!
HECK NO, False!
It's pretty obvious, don't you think? If you ask a million people this question you're gonna get a million different answers!
right?????????????
From my own experiences, it all depends on who the person is! Not everybody is out for what they can get, even aside from sex and money alone! If you or anyone thinks differently, then you're simply Stereotyping the entire human race, because NOT everybody is like that! And I am sure that you agree with this, no?????????????????????
well, hope this helps!
That's completely false. As a matter of fact true love never thinks of sex and money as reasons you should be with someone. If that's what your friend thinks then your friend has never been in a true loving and faithful relationship. Don't listen to him and follow your own instincts.
No...The reson you even care about each other is physical apperance and the emotional connection between the 2...
You couldn't make a lasting relationship based solely on Bang bang and Ca-CHing ching.....
false...
what a cheap thought......
there is something called true love
False .. Your friend is shallow
false - half right;
it's money then the sex
common Its not like that...!!!
....Its just SEX for me...!!!
false
I'm not going to lie about it, but its absolutely True.
false
Well... I have read the answers before mine and it looks unanimous that she/he is wrong.
My answer: False
My advice: If your friend has this deep an opinion on the subject, I think he/she needs to change their choice in friends.
I once heard a song (Sure wish I knew its name and who the singer was) and one of the verses went (Something) like this....
There was a pig lying in the ditch, a drunk came down the road and lay beside it. An old lady came down the road and said, you can tell who boozes by the company he choozes and the pig got up and slowly walked away.
I think you can figure out the moral here and it applies to your friend. You view the world by the part of the world you see and live in, if the view is bad, than it is up to you to change your view. Choose a better class of people to hang with and you will start to see why so many here are saying false.
Food for thought...
If what your friend says is true, than why are there so many successful marriages out there? I know all you hear is about the bad ones, people often like to talk negative and misery, but there are plenty of happy, successful marriages out there, you just don't hear about them much, they don't get in the news.
I am married to my bestest friend. We didn't used to be that way. We almost divorced several times. A good marriage or relationship takes a lot of hard work. It takes giving to your partner, not taking. It takes mentally supporting your partner and building them up., NEVER tearing them down.
If you are not going to put into it more than you hope to get out of it, you will not have a really good relationship, they don't just happen.
There are some who put everything they have into it and get nothing but a kick in the butt out of it. - Problem is... Marry in haste, repent in leisure.
Slow down, take your time, get to know each other. Build a strong friendship over time before jumping into the sack together. Than when you do take it to the next level, you have already built a solid foundation to support what you build together on top of it.True or False: The main thing you care about is sex and money when getting into relationships?
false!
HECK NO, False!
It's pretty obvious, don't you think? If you ask a million people this question you're gonna get a million different answers!
right?????????????
From my own experiences, it all depends on who the person is! Not everybody is out for what they can get, even aside from sex and money alone! If you or anyone thinks differently, then you're simply Stereotyping the entire human race, because NOT everybody is like that! And I am sure that you agree with this, no?????????????????????
well, hope this helps!
That's completely false. As a matter of fact true love never thinks of sex and money as reasons you should be with someone. If that's what your friend thinks then your friend has never been in a true loving and faithful relationship. Don't listen to him and follow your own instincts.
No...The reson you even care about each other is physical apperance and the emotional connection between the 2...
You couldn't make a lasting relationship based solely on Bang bang and Ca-CHing ching.....
false...
what a cheap thought......
there is something called true love
False .. Your friend is shallow
false - half right;
it's money then the sex
common Its not like that...!!!
....Its just SEX for me...!!!
false
I'm not going to lie about it, but its absolutely True.
false
True or False: If a teacher doesn't like you then they will probably grade you hard so you can fail?
If they don't like you then they will grade your test harder than their grading everyone else
If your a teacher be honestTrue or False: If a teacher doesn't like you then they will probably grade you hard so you can fail?
Mostly False because it depends on what kind of test it is. If it is like a multiple choice or a matching, then the teacher grades it based on answer key, but if it is like a short answer or an essay, then they tend to look harder at your answer then others. But even so, you can't really fail a class unless u dint do anything, or everything is based on opinion answers.True or False: If a teacher doesn't like you then they will probably grade you hard so you can fail?
I'm not a teacher, but as a student, I think it depends. Some teachers are above that and wouldn't do something like that, but I have teachers who I can totally see grading unfairly. And if a teacher doesn't like you they might unintentionally grade you hard too.
There are some things you can't grade hard on though, like multiple choice and math and stuff like that.
They want to draw the best out of you so they will grade your test harder, it actually means they like you.blond hair
If your a teacher be honestTrue or False: If a teacher doesn't like you then they will probably grade you hard so you can fail?
Mostly False because it depends on what kind of test it is. If it is like a multiple choice or a matching, then the teacher grades it based on answer key, but if it is like a short answer or an essay, then they tend to look harder at your answer then others. But even so, you can't really fail a class unless u dint do anything, or everything is based on opinion answers.True or False: If a teacher doesn't like you then they will probably grade you hard so you can fail?
I'm not a teacher, but as a student, I think it depends. Some teachers are above that and wouldn't do something like that, but I have teachers who I can totally see grading unfairly. And if a teacher doesn't like you they might unintentionally grade you hard too.
There are some things you can't grade hard on though, like multiple choice and math and stuff like that.
They want to draw the best out of you so they will grade your test harder, it actually means they like you.
True or False: 16x2 + 24x + 64 is a perfect square trinomial of the form A2 + 2AB + B2?
False.
16x^2 + 24x + 64 = 16x^2 + 24x + 9 + 55 = (4x+3)^2 + 55
16x^2 + 24x + 64 = 16x^2 + 24x + 9 + 55 = (4x+3)^2 + 55
True or False, Does an equilateral triangle have two equal sides?
Definitely not false and partially true. It actually has 3 equal sides.True or False, Does an equilateral triangle have two equal sides?
its 3 sides are equalTrue or False, Does an equilateral triangle have two equal sides?
True, but it's three equal sides.
yes, as long as you don't mean exactly 2. it has 3 equal sides, so clearly any 2 of them will be equal.
False a equilateral triangle has 3 equal sides
it has 3 equal sides. An Isosceles triangle has two equal sides.
three equal sides. You're thinking of an isicolis triangle.
true and false see it has 3 equal sides
yes. it actually has three equal sides, therefore it has two. trick question.
its 3 sides are equalTrue or False, Does an equilateral triangle have two equal sides?
True, but it's three equal sides.
yes, as long as you don't mean exactly 2. it has 3 equal sides, so clearly any 2 of them will be equal.
False a equilateral triangle has 3 equal sides
it has 3 equal sides. An Isosceles triangle has two equal sides.
three equal sides. You're thinking of an isicolis triangle.
true and false see it has 3 equal sides
yes. it actually has three equal sides, therefore it has two. trick question.
True or false, micro braids pull your hair out?
i see more and more girls wearing Micro Braids. i was always thinkin that they pull your hair out. but now people tell me it helps their hair grow. is that true?True or false, micro braids pull your hair out?
I think that what pulls the hair out is that they leave the braids in for too long and when they comb out their hair once they take the braids down in the process of combing out the knots they also comb out alot of their hair.
Plus the get them braided too tight to begin with and they wind up with alopecia!True or false, micro braids pull your hair out?
Those type of braid period break your hair off. I've had several kinds in my lifetime and that's all they did to me was break off my hair. Some look real cute for the moment, but really there is not much benefit from it. They told me that it would help my hair grow also, but that was a long while back and it didn't. Just recently, I've been leaving my hair natural (with a relaxer here and there), but I've been getting my tips trimmed and keeping my hair moist with Luster's Pink Lotion and Isoplus oil sheen and my hair has thickened and grew so fast.
Yes, if braided too tightly and too close to the scalp, micro-braids can pull some hair out and also cause mild to severe headaches. They do not make the hair grow any faster, but may stretch it, and that isn't good.
,.
I believe they pull your hair out, ESPECIALLY if you get relaxers/perms often. I see lots of people with them who have them too tight, %26amp; they're bald on the sides.
true i had them , and ow, and u loose hair bt not a lot. go with ur fro
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AijRhorP6iHdtYAVw3lQnd3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20081006174620AAUtNIz
i love mine
I think that what pulls the hair out is that they leave the braids in for too long and when they comb out their hair once they take the braids down in the process of combing out the knots they also comb out alot of their hair.
Plus the get them braided too tight to begin with and they wind up with alopecia!True or false, micro braids pull your hair out?
Those type of braid period break your hair off. I've had several kinds in my lifetime and that's all they did to me was break off my hair. Some look real cute for the moment, but really there is not much benefit from it. They told me that it would help my hair grow also, but that was a long while back and it didn't. Just recently, I've been leaving my hair natural (with a relaxer here and there), but I've been getting my tips trimmed and keeping my hair moist with Luster's Pink Lotion and Isoplus oil sheen and my hair has thickened and grew so fast.
Yes, if braided too tightly and too close to the scalp, micro-braids can pull some hair out and also cause mild to severe headaches. They do not make the hair grow any faster, but may stretch it, and that isn't good.
,.
I believe they pull your hair out, ESPECIALLY if you get relaxers/perms often. I see lots of people with them who have them too tight, %26amp; they're bald on the sides.
true i had them , and ow, and u loose hair bt not a lot. go with ur fro
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AijRhorP6iHdtYAVw3lQnd3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20081006174620AAUtNIz
i love mine
True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
True. Unfortunately, too many Bush haters on this site call our troops murderers, baby killers, etc. That's pathetic.True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
True. Soldiers join the military to protect their country, their homes, and their families. So if they are to die in war, we'd better make d*mned sure that they do it for the reason they joined in the first place.
It is no support of soldiers to cheer them on to their deaths when they are doing it for someone else's personal vendettas and lust for oil.
I don't want any soldiers dying, but if it is to happen then we must make sure they are doing so for the reasons they were willing to risk their lives in the first place.True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
FALSE How can you support the troops when you tell them at every turn that they are doing wrong and you are in opposition to them doing their duty,if you are opposed to the war you are opposed to the troops and make this argument for no other reason then do disassociate yourself from the controversy, your support has been misguided, you push for their care out of guilt and you patronize them through false patriotism you look at the war as being wrong and at the soldier who fights it as if he were a victim that requires your sympathy and compassion you act in their behalf only because it gives you an opportunity to lash out or criticize the administration that you oppose. No you can not you either support all or your a hypocrite. you are embarrassed because the troops are better men and women then you, they are all volunteers not draftees and they would not volunteer if they did not support the cause. they have nothing but contempt for those who would straddle the fence in their eyes you are a coward for not taking a stand one way or the other there is no middle. and don't bother with the they only enlisted for the job or the school crap they would have to be brain dead idiots to belive they joined the military to do anything but fight. Only Micheal Moore could come up with some bs like that.
The troops are humans that joined a military that they want to help defend and protect but they can not even tell you where they will be. Its the goverment thats there boss and they have no coice or else jail. THey are doing there job, They should not be picked on for that! No one should for doing a honest days work!! Honest!! Its honest so its cool. I hate though when they come back and the chose to join they expect to get a job over you! My niece did and I hated that!!
true...
why shouldn't you be there for the soldiers that is your brother, sister, husband, wife, etc... its like saying i dont like what your doing but i'll support you and be there for you.
True - we'll soon be patching them up for years to come when we get them out of that mideast sh*t hole. Can't happen quick enough for me.
Then Li'l Bushy goes to prison.
';OH NO! I'm FOR the war, I'm just against the troops!';
-Bill Hicks
My sister is VERY patriotic. She supports the troops, but not this war.
TRUE!!!!!
True:By support you mean bringen' em' home =)
True. Soldiers join the military to protect their country, their homes, and their families. So if they are to die in war, we'd better make d*mned sure that they do it for the reason they joined in the first place.
It is no support of soldiers to cheer them on to their deaths when they are doing it for someone else's personal vendettas and lust for oil.
I don't want any soldiers dying, but if it is to happen then we must make sure they are doing so for the reasons they were willing to risk their lives in the first place.True or False: You don't have to support the war in order to support the soldiers fighting it?
FALSE How can you support the troops when you tell them at every turn that they are doing wrong and you are in opposition to them doing their duty,if you are opposed to the war you are opposed to the troops and make this argument for no other reason then do disassociate yourself from the controversy, your support has been misguided, you push for their care out of guilt and you patronize them through false patriotism you look at the war as being wrong and at the soldier who fights it as if he were a victim that requires your sympathy and compassion you act in their behalf only because it gives you an opportunity to lash out or criticize the administration that you oppose. No you can not you either support all or your a hypocrite. you are embarrassed because the troops are better men and women then you, they are all volunteers not draftees and they would not volunteer if they did not support the cause. they have nothing but contempt for those who would straddle the fence in their eyes you are a coward for not taking a stand one way or the other there is no middle. and don't bother with the they only enlisted for the job or the school crap they would have to be brain dead idiots to belive they joined the military to do anything but fight. Only Micheal Moore could come up with some bs like that.
The troops are humans that joined a military that they want to help defend and protect but they can not even tell you where they will be. Its the goverment thats there boss and they have no coice or else jail. THey are doing there job, They should not be picked on for that! No one should for doing a honest days work!! Honest!! Its honest so its cool. I hate though when they come back and the chose to join they expect to get a job over you! My niece did and I hated that!!
true...
why shouldn't you be there for the soldiers that is your brother, sister, husband, wife, etc... its like saying i dont like what your doing but i'll support you and be there for you.
True - we'll soon be patching them up for years to come when we get them out of that mideast sh*t hole. Can't happen quick enough for me.
Then Li'l Bushy goes to prison.
';OH NO! I'm FOR the war, I'm just against the troops!';
-Bill Hicks
My sister is VERY patriotic. She supports the troops, but not this war.
TRUE!!!!!
True:By support you mean bringen' em' home =)
True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
While some might want some side action, I think the majority would simply be complimenting you on your charm, wit and artistic nature.
**EDIT** Whoa, I don't know if I want to play here... these peeps are kind of mean!True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
This depends on where you work. If you work in a chicken factory, this might mean they want you. Otherwise, false.
Rooster in a hen house.True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
It means ure probably charming...but in a humours way where there is no harm..therefor false..they get it...and so do u Rrrrrrico......80's hittttttttt Swaaavvvvveeeeeeiiiiiiiii,.
Only if you are female yourself.
No,but watch for other hints.If she wants it,she won't stop there.
Listen to waht was said by Puppy Calzone. Not at work dude, not at work....
False! Just a little humor in the office
Yeah its more like flirting. She is definitely giving you your props if she likes Latin Lovers!
It means they're laughing at you in Spanish.
No.
Maybe, but they are probably making fun of you.
No. They are making fun of you right to your face.
false they're just having fun (having a joke with you)
No, it means they are making fun of you.
Yes, I think you should go for it!
**EDIT** Whoa, I don't know if I want to play here... these peeps are kind of mean!True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
This depends on where you work. If you work in a chicken factory, this might mean they want you. Otherwise, false.
Rooster in a hen house.True or False: If your female co-workers call you rico suave, does that mean they want side action?
It means ure probably charming...but in a humours way where there is no harm..therefor false..they get it...and so do u Rrrrrrico......80's hittttttttt Swaaavvvvveeeeeeiiiiiiiii,.
Only if you are female yourself.
No,but watch for other hints.If she wants it,she won't stop there.
Listen to waht was said by Puppy Calzone. Not at work dude, not at work....
False! Just a little humor in the office
Yeah its more like flirting. She is definitely giving you your props if she likes Latin Lovers!
It means they're laughing at you in Spanish.
No.
Maybe, but they are probably making fun of you.
No. They are making fun of you right to your face.
false they're just having fun (having a joke with you)
No, it means they are making fun of you.
Yes, I think you should go for it!
True or False: You know at least one person that Never Ever watches television?
I know a number of people who do not watch television. I know dozens of people who don't even own a television.True or False: You know at least one person that Never Ever watches television?
yes. they spend most of their time working at a job they hate to provide for their family and the rest of the time sleeping, paying bills, and reading the news paper.True or False: You know at least one person that Never Ever watches television?
I have a friend who is Amish they do not even have electric in the house. But you know its one house that you love to visit. Its peaceful.I wish I could do it
false.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
answer mine?
True.
My neighbour. She is, well, different.
True. I have a friend who's parent's are psychiatrists who study effects of TV on the brain and don't let their son watch it.
True,
My psychology teacher.
She's a weirdo
um definitely false!
true.
her step mom won't let her.
false... EVERYONE *I* know watches tv
True
%26lt;--- :)
False
*heavy sigh* true. I feel sorry for him
False, because even if you're walking by a store then you see it on, that still counts....or you tube.
False.
True, she doesn't own a TV.
True.
I don't and neither does my son that two- cable companies are going to price themselves right out of business!
True....a few....!!
true
false
true
true
false
true. one of my dance teachers hasn't even owned a tv in five years.
false.
I am. I watch only movies by Netflix on comp. hate ads
i dont
heck no!!
A guy I met in India.
true
(does my teacher count?) lolblond hair
yes. they spend most of their time working at a job they hate to provide for their family and the rest of the time sleeping, paying bills, and reading the news paper.True or False: You know at least one person that Never Ever watches television?
I have a friend who is Amish they do not even have electric in the house. But you know its one house that you love to visit. Its peaceful.I wish I could do it
false.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;鈥?/a>
answer mine?
True.
My neighbour. She is, well, different.
True. I have a friend who's parent's are psychiatrists who study effects of TV on the brain and don't let their son watch it.
True,
My psychology teacher.
She's a weirdo
um definitely false!
true.
her step mom won't let her.
false... EVERYONE *I* know watches tv
True
%26lt;--- :)
False
*heavy sigh* true. I feel sorry for him
False, because even if you're walking by a store then you see it on, that still counts....or you tube.
False.
True, she doesn't own a TV.
True.
I don't and neither does my son that two- cable companies are going to price themselves right out of business!
True....a few....!!
true
false
true
true
false
true. one of my dance teachers hasn't even owned a tv in five years.
false.
I am. I watch only movies by Netflix on comp. hate ads
i dont
heck no!!
A guy I met in India.
true
(does my teacher count?) lol
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)